To be more specific, I was talking about paid developers, not volunteers. There isn’t a matter of preference, at least for me, of who is leading or working on whatever, but there should be transparency from where they are paid. So, if they are not under the umbrella of TFL, a new team developer’s wallet should be officially created.
The volunteers are the only developers the community has at the moment willing to make things happen, so as far as I’m concerned (and provided they are willing to keep developing/improving the chain on a regular basis) they are the developers that should be paid.
And yes I agree, would be much cleaner if the core dev proceeds from the fees collection were ending up in a multisig wallet (managed by various communities’ key members) where a contract is doing the airdrop to named dev addresses. So if a new core developer were to come on-board or leave would take more than one person to make this decision actionable.
1 Like