First of all, I reread the Whitepaper, interesting and illuminating given the events in the last months.
To insiders: Did the team follow the intent of Whitepaper?
If you did, then clearly there are major flaws in the design and it should be scrapped and re-conceived.
If you did NOT follow it, then Why not? Would you bear some responsibility in not following the plan that everyone bought into? Was a new Whitepaper written for V2? I might have missed that.
In the discussion of LUNC moving forward, we have all just glossed over the fact that many of the extremely large position are held by the same team in charge of V2, insiders, developers and validators. So in these discussions of burning and the path forward, we realize that some of you will likely make much more money with a LUNC recovery that most of us promoting the rebuilding.
To be honest, since you gain the most from the V2 fork, the honorable thing to do if you have no interest in LUNC going forward would be to burn your own wallets completely, release control over LUNC and stay working on V2. So will you do that? Yet to be seen.
There is no reason that the growth of LUNC and LUNA cannot share a parallel path, but it seems insiders object to others making money on a LUNC recovery?? Why is that? it make no sense in a mature conversation. There are some that are traders no doubt, but the majority are looking at a long term growth path built around the original intent of speed and low fees.
The most sensible move would be for the small number of holders from the insiders is to let new governance take over, if you want to participate, fine. If not, then burn your own holdings and focus your efforts on V2.
What say you?