You only have written descriptions that you sold 80,000 BTC, but you have never provided proof of transaction records, so how can you believe that 80,000 BTC was really used to maintain stability over UST? The whole thing is very unscientific and has no evidence. .
1 Like
When transactions are done on a CEX, it doesn’t happen on-chain. Therefore, there is no transaction hash.
CEX also has transaction records, have you never used CEX?
We need more data than a tweet. The team has had no issue broadcasting everything to the market (likely painting a massive target on our backs and providing very clear framework for how to dismantle the project), dont push back now when people want a little evidence on where billions of capital went that didnt actually protect the project as intended.