Were the community funds not going to be removed already from the snapshot? I thought I read that somewhere. If that’s the case then there is no benifit to burn them.
So if burning benifits are already removed then does it not make sense to save thise funds as a just in case?
Oh really? That’s interesting, so the total supply is for snapshot terms is around 10,038,000,000 ? Regardless of burn? I thought it had to happen prior. Turns out the vote ends 90 seconds prior to the snapshot. Is the burn automatic when the vote ends?
I think this burn plan is in place to ensure there are no community funds available to the original Luna blockchain post v2 genesis. It makes it that much more difficult for the community to resurrect the original chain. However, if that is the intention the plan will fail as I am confident that the community will come together to work on the original Luna. The first order of business has to be to re-enable delegations for validator staking, so that new community operated validator nodes can be established on the v1 chain.
This vote seems to pass at the same time as post attack snapshot right?? What are the chances?
Do we know how soon burn happens after it is passed? I wonder also the impact of being able to sell UST after snap shot. Won’t everyone sell? Will there be buyers? Why would someone buy? Will the burn actually benefit those still holding?
I get that but what harm does it to to hold it? What benifit is there to burn it. These are the questions that need to be considered. If it’s not causing harm, and is no benifit to burn it then why rush to do this?
That is where I am struggling to find a reason to burn potentially $1.3 Billion dollars (in future vale IF we can restore it). Due dillegence needs to be done here.