Title: Proposed distribution method for 0.5% emergency LUNA allocation
Introduction
This proposal is being made on behalf of a diverse group of Terra community members (including representatives of community members, validators, TFL, and others), and is intended to supplement the Terra Ecosystem Revival Plan 2 (the “Plan”)
Over the past few days there has been fervent dialogue around how to appropriately distribute the 0.5% emergency LUNA allocation. As a reminder, the Terra Ecosystem Revival Plan 2 specified 10% of LUNA supply to be earmarked to incentivize developers on Terra 2.0 as follows:
- Emergency allocation (0.5% of total supply (the “Emergency Fund”)): immediately after network launch to provide for runway while they build out product. Commit to returning funds if product has not been launched in 1 year.
- Developer Alignment Program (1.5% of total supply): Protocol teams that were live in Terra Classic divide this allocation weighted by the last 30 day TVL from Pre-attack snapshot - 1 year cliff, 3 year vesting thereafter. Accommodations will be made for apps where TVL is not applicable.
- Developer Mining Program (8% of total supply): Essential app developers earn a share of the mining program proceeds pro-rata to the amount of TVL every quarter for 4 years.
While the Plan was descriptive of how the “Developer Alignment” and “Developer Mining” funds should be distributed, it did not specify how to allocate the Emergency Fund. As a result, guidance is needed from LUNA governance to determine an appropriate determination of this aspect of the Plan.
There has been ample discussion regarding the Emergency Fund, and taking the community’s feedback and input, this proposal represents what we believe to be the best path forward.
Goals
As we see it, there are three cohorts eligible to receive the Emergency Fund:
- Projects who launched on Terra Classic and achieved product-market fit and TVL
- Projects who launched on Terra Classic and achieved product-market fit but have no measurable TVL
- Projects (pre- and post-launch) who have not yet achieved product-market fit (pre-PMF)
We want to ensure that projects who achieved product-market fit have the support and incentives to continue to build on Terra 2.0. We also want to ensure that the long-tail of projects who have not yet achieved product-market fit have support to continue building until an opportunity to secure funding from traditional means arises.
Proposed distribution
As the name “Emergency Fund” suggests, we believe it makes sense to start bottoms-up by figuring out what smaller projects need as their runway. In order to do this, it’s important to define: 1) a minimum amount that all eligible projects should receive and 2) a target number of projects that should receive this amount.
Polls taken within the community chats indicate projects require between $100-300K for 6 months of runway. Looking at the various lists compiled such as this, there are around 50 projects looking to qualify for this emergency funding.
As a result, we suggest a distribution of $100-300K of LUNA to eligible pre-PMF teams. Eligibility and allocations would be determined by a council consisting of longstanding Terra community members: Karma, Panterra0x, Cephii, Seb, and GJ. Each individual has vowed to recuse him or herself in the event of any potential conflict of interest on specific projects.
In addition to this, we suggest that teams who had launched and achieved product market fit or added value to tooling and infrastructure receive an additional $500K – $1M in LUNA. As an initial suggestion, we put forth Coinhall, Terrascope, Setten, SCV, Terran One, Random Earth, Knowhere, Leap Wallet, and TFM to be in this cohort.
To summarize, 1.5M LUNA would be distributed across the long tail of pre-PMF teams, an additional 1M LUNA would be distributed across teams with PMF but no TVL, for a total of 2.5M LUNA. This would leave precisely 50% to distribute to projects who had achieved product market fit and TVL on Terra Classic and are committed to building on Terra 2.0.
For these projects who achieved PMF and had TVL, we suggest pre-depeg Terra Classic TVL as the best metric in defining their value to the network and resulting share of the Emergency Fund. We suggest the 2.5M LUNA is distributed pro-rata based on contribution to TVL, with a max cap set at 25% of the allocation for any individual project and any remainder above that cap being uniformly distributed to the other projects.
Based on the above criteria and our current understanding of Terra 2 builder commitments, we currently anticipate that the TVL-based allocation of the Emergency Fund would look like this:
Raw Weight | TVL Based Comp | Astro Cap Distributed | New Totals | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Terraswap | 10.2% | $1,403,720 | $197,335 | $1,601,055 |
Spectrum Protocol | 5.2% | $710,148 | $197,335 | $907,483 |
ApolloDAO | 1.6% | $224,153 | $197,335 | $421,488 |
Nexus Protocol | 2.8% | $385,287 | $197,335 | $582,622 |
Astroport | 39.4% | $5,410,850 | $3,437,500 | |
Stader | 18.9% | $2,593,136 | $197,335 | $2,790,471 |
White Whale | 0.9% | $123,180 | $197,335 | $320,515 |
PRISM Protocol | 14.3% | $1,964,006 | $197,335 | $2,161,341 |
Edge Protocol | 0.6% | $88,090 | $197,335 | $285,425 |
Risk Harbor | 4.32% | $594,509 | $197,335 | $791,844 |
Aperture Protocol | 1.84% | $252,922 | $197,335 | $450,257 |
In summary, 5M of Luna would be distributed as follows:
- 2.5M of Luna across projects who launched on Terra Classic and achieved product-market fit and TVL (PMF and TVL)
- 1M of Luna across projects who launched on Terra Classic and achieved product-market fit but have no measurable TVL (PMF but no TVL)
- 1.5M of Luna across projects (pre- and post-launch) who have not yet achieved product-market fit (pre-PMF)
Performance Conditions
As stated in Terra Ecosystem Revival Plan 2, each team will be required to sign a pledge committing to:
- Use its portion of the emergency fund to help fund development on Terra 2.0 for at least one year
- Launch some product on Terra 2.0 within 3 months of receiving the allocation
- Provide transparency to the community in the form of quarterly public reporting on Agora on its progress and use of funds
If a team fails to fulfill these requirements, it is expected that they will return the LUNA received such that it can be allocated to other builders.
Acknowledgement of this proposal’s imperfection — and call to action
This proposal represents best efforts to incorporate widely ranging feedback from over 300 contributors to Terra space, including Validators, Teams, and community representatives.
It attempts the impossible - to distribute value among a diversified range of projects and contributors, in unprecedented circumstances, and under heavy time constraints.
The proposed framework has one goal, which is to retain builders on Terra. It does so by:
A) providing monetary incentives to high TVL projects that have already received competitive offers from other ecosystems
B) providing capital for mid- to smaller size teams to redeploy, repivot or change PMF and introduce their projects to Terra.
While we are open to feedback and constructive improvement suggestions, we urge everyone to remain mindful that many improvement attempts would require a framework of evaluation that doesn’t exist yet. While we are hopeful this grants & evaluation framework will materialize, it will take time to establish, whereas many smaller teams are in imminent danger of collapse or departure.
For this reason, we suggest distributing 50% of the funds now - optimizing for speed of execution and getting a baseline distribution out now - and 50% after 2-3 months, to ensure that teams receiving the funds have made meaningful progress on product development.