Do you happen to have an order of magnitude of accumulation over a week using the Tx fees excluding tax-based proceeds? To be honest with you I gave up on the cap idea in favor of the fee increase, it feels like the natural way of doing this and is future-proof. So, maybe we need to rework the increase rate.
For a low-volume week, I got down to a monthly collection of 75M (that excludes noticeable big jumps in the CP allocation due to remint). That’s circa 375M per month on low volume with an x5 increase in tx fees!
due to discussions and alternatives, we are refining the proposal. It has definitely evolved since we started. Good news is that the L1 team has a hot fix for the upgrade handlers now, so we can look into parameterizing the splits, and/or also look into creating a second burn wallet that is exempt from seigniorage. See the hotfix here. A new discussion will be forthcoming in the next few days.
Hello @ek826,
Are you guys going to abandon the hard coded changes to the antehandler since the community pool funding has been achieved via the x5 gas hike. It seems that according to your roadmap - it is still on the table?
If you plan to go ahead with changes - do you have any mkre news if all of this will be controlled by governance vote.
Also did you manage to reach some kind of agreement with TR over the repository to avoid adding time and effort costs ?
Best Regards!
