What about UST deposited on spectrum or pylon pools?
1 Like
Stop bla bla bullshit here. So what is your “SMART” solution that can solve this situation?
You are better than in CZ in crypto space?
What they’re proposing is hilariously illegal. Get ready to file suits and report this so they get charged criminally as well
5 Likes
What about UST deposited in pylon?
Sounds fair
1 Like
According to the on-chain analysis, all Terra’s BTC reserve were sent to Binance and Gemini. So TerraLuna is pretty much fkd up big one.
people get rich buy luna in the deep and we get suffering such a lovely world
Just invest 300-400m$ to buy back as much supply and burn u will make it double or more in a week after burn maybe next day.
then buy luna now at this prices…
Also, not sure about which bucket u fit into? did u sellout and went into other coins & still expect a compensation?
1 Like
“Not your keys, not your coins.”
So, you are a thief seething with jealousy ill-concealed beneath cheap snark. You have quite the nerve—not only advocating a rug-pull, but even being both smug and spiteful about it.
Where were you when others were throwing in good money, bidding up the LUNA price to stop it from literally falling to zero? I like the small amount of LUNA that you must have compared to me—you think you’ll steal the money that I risked on a dying project. Not OK, and the community must call out and shame your ilk if it wants to survive as a viable project.
I am serious about that last. In the short term, tolerating the open advocacy of rugging investors sets the course that can only end in the way foreshadowed by CZ’s disapproval. (You think you’ll steal my money, OK, have fun recovering any value yourself when Binance and every other reputable exchange delists absolutely anything that Terra makes.) And in the long term, there is a deeper issue.
Welcome to crypto: Do any of the newbies here wonder why BTC is so dominant? Short answer: Because people trust it. Why do people trust it? Among other reasons, the blockchain is irrevocable. That means that you never need to worry that someone will decide to rewrite your wallet balances based on their opinion, or on popular opinion, or on anybody’s opinion.
It doesn’t matter what price you paid. It doesn’t matter if people like you or not. The token is fungible: 1 BTC = 1 BTC. Wallet balances are decided by the unbiased application of well-known transaction rules that everybody has accepted for a long time. What you see in your wallet, is what you have in your wallet unless or until you spend it. And that’s that—period.
Big money will never entrust itself to a blockchain where money can be made to disappear by arbitrary whims.
Chains that put people’s wallet balances up for a vote are already untrustworthy. The idea is poison to prospects of future value: It shows that rugging some investors in favor of others is, at least, an option open to debate.
Thus, even for bottom-feeding opportunists who don’t reject the proposal on the basis that “stealing money is wrong”, it is myopic and self-defeating not to reject it on the basis of self-interest. Want your investment to be worth something? You need to earn people’s trust—or at least, try to avoid engaging in public behavior that screams, “THE SCAMMING OF INVESTORS IS WELCOME HERE!”
2 Likes
Why not simply burn 95% of the supply???
What attack happened? 
nothing was hacked, why would you get compensated in crypto?
2 Likes
Can they distribute tokens to etoro non-wallet trade? Of course not, then how about them? 
Etoro liquidated them because of the -99%. They don’t have a wallet to receive the said distribution. Besides, I don’t think we need to rush everything here. The attacker seems to be very clever and he may be expecting this all and might blow his final nuke to the entire network. Every effort will be useless if that happens. More suicidal, more blame game more losses but only one gets rich. Security and Stability first!
Owners of a fungible token absolutely have a right to expect that their tokens will be treated just like everybody else’s. If you don’t understand that, try looking up the word “fungible” in a dictionary.
Next, look up the word “thief”. That is what you are: You advocate the theft of money from people who bought a fungible token at a price lower which, according to your mere whim, is just too low. After that, try learning how markets work.
5 Likes
Yea also the people who not believed in terra are gonna profit and the people who bought later and pumped loquidity in are gonna lose. Great.
just try stake and burn,forking is bad idea
2 Likes
You think who sold 6900B LUNA to buy back UST?
It’s decision of founder, he decided to sacrified LUNA to save UST
Not old nor new holder - it’s all LUNA holders.
and anyone have the right to hold/sell/buy - EQUAL - It’s the nature
1 Like
What do you mean “scavengers”, they
basically took the risk and bought it off panicked sellers.
6 Likes
If they did what you want, and the attacker got a position at the all-time low of both Luna and UST, destabilization version 2 will be very easy. He needs to find out who the hell is responsible for all of this, secure the network and then provide a mechanism that will safeguard Luna and Terra.
Terra, so after 2 days, is this still the only plan? Because it sucks, it is against the law and will bury Terra forever. Come on, I hope you have a room of smart people, scratch this proposal.