Both are equally important, considering both the coins had claimed a fair number of casualties. It will selfish to claim which is priority over the other.
except the fact that ust was meant to be ‘stable’
do you agree that ust depeg caused luna hyperinflation and not viceversa? @Passerby
One sinks and the other goes down with it. Hard fact.
ust sinked and then luna went down with it. Hard fact. @Passerby
Yes, “UST 2.0” will be sounds like joke, nobody will use that.
useless comment @NN78
Check my idea - set maximum amount of token $ustc and also add burning mechanism. It can go more than 1$ because there is not much coins, only what we have to do to change tokenomy and do from this coin something like deflatory token.
$ustc 10.000.000.000 coins vs. Lunc with around x100000 more
With burning mechanism it can be game changer
sounds cool but can’t work with the mint / burn mechanism. When you swap luna for ust, you burn 1 $ worth of luna and mint 1 ust (not 1 $ worth of ust), and if ust has a max supply you can’t mint anymore once reached it.
hypotetically a deflationary ust makes it not spendible = no use cases except holding = bad cash flow and low ecosystem’s revenues, which is the opposite of what we want
I saw the passed proposal about burning the ust comunity pool, could it be enough for you? @Max_Seagram
Just confused of lunc