Hi @cheeze ,
I too have used your dashboard and found it very helpful, and I watched as you helped new validators come on board with real practical help (and made yourself available).
I know there are some comments circulating about TGF’s purpose, which seem to go directly against the proposal that created it. Particularly, that proposal discussion stated:
**The grants program does not actually fund anything, just collects proposals, organizes independent reviews, makes recommendations via these reviews, and keeps projects accountable. All community spend proposals still need to go through governance and voting by the community.
It also stated:
*This grants program does not prevent the submission of any community pool distribution on its own. This will be the recommended method to request a grant due to the oversight, peer review, and rationale described above.
The Terra White Paper does acknowledge using fiscal policy in spending proposals that may encourage anything that is “solving real problems for users,
increasing Terra’s adoption and as a result increasing the GDP of the Terra economy,” highlights dApps and smart contracts particularly.
I look forward to hearing from other delegators in this discussion to see if they found it a useful tool as well for tracking validator statistics, and other validators that may have used it to determine their statistics in areas that other dashboards may not take into account (such as oracle voting misses).
I hope you are having an awesome day today 