I assume you are accusing the Validators with this statement.
In theory you are correct and I never said otherwise. Could be one or a group with equal intentions.
That said opening up staking will increase the odds of such attacks and unlike the current validators the new ones could have malicious intent rather than fixing the chain.
Now how likley could someone pull off a real pos 51 attack? Are there already safeguards in place to prevent it? If they already exist and can be adjusted to work on the super inflated position we are in now. Than we could be fine. That NEEDS to be confirmed is all I am saying. We need safeguards in place. Then I agree with opening up staking. My gazzillion coins could be earning me more coins so of course Iâm open to it.
One more thing needs to be addressed regarding staking and that is rewards. With the pending increase on the size of the staked tokens how will that reflect in rewards? Rewards are already Increasing the circulation supply faster and running out of coins to pay rewards is a concern. Were burning on one end to bring the total supply down, while increasing circulating supply by nearly a Billion a day.
What is happening with the current validators is also not ok either btw. I do see that they are gaming the voting system and regardless of their intentions, the fact that itâs possible needs to be fixed.