What I love is that the discussion is happening, generally, on all sides, period. This is a huge characteristic of the community which is necessary to bring about choice and, over time, decisions that benefit the chain. Keep up the discussion everyone and remember Rome wasn’t built in a day. Thanks, peace, & love to all.
1 Like
Swap all for Lunc. Burn half of those Lunc and send the other half to pool.
Maybe pay devs in Lunc every 3 months based on their performence? @ek826 , @Vegas and @Zaradar as those who will evaluate other contributors and put a proposal every 3 months who deserves what?
Yes he shoots from the hip bypassing his brain.
But he is highly intelligent a bit like Elon too intelligent and stupid at the same time.
You’ll find that super intelligent ppl often lack social skills.
That’s our Alex… he often throws in the grenade with the help of Ed & Tobias who give him a platform to pitch his ideas.
Does that make Ed and Tobias equally culpable?
They are biased towards their prodigal son Alex… it is what it is…
In Summary: Alex is super intelligent without social skills…
I don’t think he’s the enemy of the state but someone should get him to go on a PR course to brush up his weaknesses.
I’ve learnt a lot from Alex about the Terra Classic chain… for that part he has my respect. It’s important to acknowledge and focus on peoples strengths…
But agree sometimes those grenades sink the Terra Classic ship!
5 Likes
What you just described is precisely a person who should not be in any management position ever since he needs to be care taken by more composed individuals. I would also argue that he is a tunnel-vision inteligent type of a person who does not respect the approach of others and instead of working with them tries to impose his own will to replace that. Since weeks he has pissed so many people off only to achieve absolutely no deliverables. If he has some great detail-level number crunching skills - great - that’s useful advice. Letting such person step into leadership role? Hell no.
This looks like more and more how a sociopath would go about running things - send 5000$ to the people needed to achieve his goal to have them on his side lending credibility with the ultimate goal to run things out of belief he is the only intelligent person around and noone else is worthy of the post.
2 Likes
Hello community. I support Vegas’ proposal for one simple reason. The money and POWER STAYS WITH THE COMMUNITY.
Alex and TR’s proposal delegates the POWER of DECISION, ECONOMIC MANAGEMENT and DEVELOPMENT to 9 people. Who can easily be forced by power groups to do the things they want. We already see what happens globally with the different government administrations. Centralization promotes others outside the chain or elected government to control decisions through corruption or threats to the people in government. More so if there is NO LEGAL INSTRUMENT that the elected 9 have signed to fulfill obligations to the community.
On this last point. No one (of the 9 self elected members) has proposed any of the following:
- A Work plan or a general Idea of where we want to go (I recently uploaded an idea of how to contribute to it). That is why there are so many differences. There is NO CLEAR NORTH. A master plan to be concretized. They look at different trees and not at the FOREST THAT SUPPORTS AND FEEDS THEM. The community and confidence in the project.
- What are the steps to be taken to get there? Simply to make DApps of games and lottery? And “others to come”?
- In every labor relationship instrument there is a LEGAL INSTRUMENT where the OBLIGATIONS, TASKS TO BE PERFORMED, WARRANTIES AND PENALTIES IN CASE OF FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH WHAT THE PARTIES COMMIT TO. In this case the 9 elected and the community.
- Therefore, the 9 elected… Do they have legal and financial backing (apart from the knowledge) to carry out such obligations (which will be determined by the community in a road map for that purpose)? Can they get endorsements that respond as guarantees to the community for non-compliance with some of their obligations?.. Or simply if something goes wrong they are not responsible for anything. Is that what they propose?
This Vegas proposal is simple… the money and the power remains in the hands of the community. Which means that NO ONE CAN DIRECTLY INTERVENE in the management of their own economy and decision making.
How do we, the community, know that Alex contacted DK and it was not the other way around? They want to sell us a movie of heroes and committed people, when their sayings and actions go in the opposite direction of only looking out for their own benefit.
How do we know if DK, under pressure from his judicial situation, did not call Alex (who clearly thinks for himself) to get rid of such wallets that can bring him problems judicially in the future? Suddenly, DK wants to make us a gift of millions, and does not seek any benefit for himself?
How do we know if this money that appears now, with an intention of Centrality in its management, is not given by POWER GROUPS to divide the community, and if this works out well for them, to take control and management by those Economic Groups that want it? In both cases they win. With the Centrality and with the Division.
The community wins if:
A. It has power of decision of its money and economic administration.
B. It can decide where to go and how to move forward. With a CLEAR NORTH.
C. It is UNITY in pursuit of that progress in the short, medium and long term.
4 Likes
Because you have achieve the goal of gathering some army for yourself doesn’t mean that any PR you will bring up will go through!
I personally voted the 1.2% B/T because it was necessary to see if it would’ve work and after a month or so that it didn’t work it was necessary to lower the tax but you Vega voted “no with veto” and would’ve done worse if you had the power.
Now there’s opportunity to fund the TR dev who has been working tirelessly, here you are with a PR that mislead the community!
You create a text PR, you don’t know how to code+ lots of disability.
Disease from this Vegas because you will fail, just the way you always fail and the way you fail even after voting “no with veto” to reduce the B/T to 0.2%
This PR you just put up here is pointless and useless!
2 Likes
a lot of people are advertising lunc social for free, do you mind paying these people
İ think no
Pay to Alex, for Terra anti-pr? (ustn etc.)
I only have 2 objections.
First take alex out of the 9 key holders, he is unstable.
Second, 5k salary is for programming, not just for key guard development.
2 Likes
Could you rework your proposal to an elected body of 9 rather than self appointed?
I think that would be something everyone would find fairer and more transparent.
Also the 500k per year to distribute a 4mil fund seems a little excessive.
3 Likes
So what will we be throwing cash at? What’s the core design plan that will preserve the supplies of Lunc &USTC that the ETH converted to Lunc will fund? If there is no time for the community pool - let’s see the plan…
I have one if you need to find it:
Fixes the PoS dilemma too…
Alex is the main devil dont know why he has a support of Ed and zaradar… Why he include him self for 5k 
every prop created by him is a pure crap
1 Like
disagree this reclaiming, if we use total 4.17 million buy back Lunc and it to community pool, which make lunc’s price down trend (may be at 0.00005), this time I think we need upgrade blockchain as soon as possible so use money pay for our smart developers, we need get high utility to get high volume!
1 Like
The 1.2% proposal that you voted for was supposed to last for a MINIMUM of 3 months and not 3 weeks.
1 Like