Full disclosure: I recently acquired more LUNC.
For those of us who fell in love with the LUNA classic network and its outstanding set of dApps with their seamless and easy-to-use UX, this past year has been an incredibly painful experience.
For reasons that all seem obvious in hindsight, UST failed to deliver on its central promise of stability for its holders. Some argued that the very premise of a partially-collateralized decentralized stable coin was a pipe dream and the depegging event was simply evidence of that fact.
However, with the recent failure of Silicon Valley Bank and its relationship with USDC, I think we all need to realize the value of having a truly decentralized stable coin, and I believe USTC can still keep that promise.
Let’s make USTC useful again.
Why should LUNC holders care about USTC? Because without USTC, there is nothing to distinguish LUNC from any other meme coin.
Or to put in terms that meme holders will understand: without restoring the burn mechanism, LUNC will NEVER give you LAMBO.
First of all, I want to acknowledge upfront that any revitalization plan requires trade offs. I think there was a lot of magical thinking around re-pegging UST to $1 which immediately followed the collapse that has hopefully subsided by now.
Here are the constraints that my plan attempts to satisfy:
- NO NEW COINS (only pure LUNC/USTC)
- Minimal development efforts
- Restore USTC as a useful medium for transactions
- Provide long-term value for current USTC holders
- Burn LUNC
- Incentivize/reward LUNC stakers
- Restore the original mint/burn mechanism that resulted in the largest decentralized stable coin in history
Okay so what’s the plan?
The plan has two parts:
- Set peg for USTC at 1/100 to the dollar or $0.01
- Create a wallet funded by LUNC/USTC transaction volume which automatically delivers a dividend to any Terra classic wallets holding USTC at the time of mint/burn mechanism reactivation in proportion to their holdings.
Why is this a good idea?
There is a fundamental tension which exists between the interests of current USTC holders and current LUNC holders. This tension is destroying the chain’s ability to recover. LUNC holders must offer USTC holders some long-term incentive to realize a 99% haircut on their holdings.
This new USTC dividend wallet should grow more valuable as the chain grows and transaction volume increases. This gives USTC holders an incentive to support this proposal and be willing to take the haircut.
Part of the magical thinking I referenced above is the idea that USTC in its current form can regain the $1 peg. Unfortunately, this is not realistic as there is no way to reasonably cover its over $10 billion in outstanding liability.
Furthermore, LUNC holders will benefit because my plan ensures the USTC pegging to $0.01 will burn
LUNC, not mint.
How does that burn guarantee work?
Once the plan is adopted, USTC is sure to immediately nosedive to close to the proposed new peg price of $0.01. There needs to be a mechanism in place to prevent USTC falling below $0.01 and starting a new unholy death spiral between LUNC and USTC.
Two important mechanisms should ensure this doesn’t happen. Firstly. Maintaining USTC’s peg at $0.01 reduces USTC’s outstanding liability to a much more manageable ~$110 million. Secondly, the fund for USTC holders at the time of the re-activation of the burn/mint mechanism should ensure that USTC still trades at a premium prior to reactivation.
(Value of USTC at re-activation) = $0.01 + estimated value of future wallet fund dividends
Once that value is locked in, USTC and LUNC can resume its once powerful relationship and bring utility back to the chain.
Hopefully this will set us on a much more sustainable path for future growth and reward both current LUNC and USTC holders in the process.
On a personal note, I lost a ton of money when UST depegged and still had faith in the networks ability to recover. This was magical thinking.
A year later, I would be willing to realize that haircut if it meant the overall network health could recover, and I was offered some personal financial stake in the recovery of the network.
I would love nothing more than to see beloved dApps like Anchor, Kujira, Stader, etc. return to the chain, and all they have to do is update their USTC related pricing.
I look forward to engaging in any thoughtful discussion.