You are seriously trying to argue that stakers weren’t better for LUNA?
So everyone who supported and bought all the hyperinflation dips on LUNA should get rekt?
They bringed in cash flow to save UST and to earn on it.
Their are the strongest part of the community right now, as no one else bought when hyperinflation dump saved UST. Now they should spent that on UST to save the UST… they didn’t hyperinflate LUNA token to buy back LUNA with it… 
They pulled values with ‘infinite minting’ towards saving UST.
Lunatics bought all the dips way down deep to save the project, to earn on it, so they can be part in the community for years and if it recovers they not just saved UST and LUNA, but they earned their profit too.
That’s why repegging the UST 1:1 is a priority
2 Likes
It doesn’t matter what is better. My Luna is the same value as your Luna.
5 Likes
Any relaunch should actually be based on how much $ value was originally invested. If somebody put in $100 to get 1 LUNA vs $100 to get 100 million LUNA, that should equal the same.
2 Likes
Staking luna to help the network and you get rewarded I don’t think that greedy.
People who leverage on UST are the greedy Ones. Anchor protocol is the Achilles of Terra Luna because of UST unrealistic APY.
Agree 1000000% with you. FAIR DISTRIBUTION TO ALL CURRENT HOLDERS. DONT INCENTIVE THE DUMPERS. DONT LOOK AT THE AMOUNT OF TOKENS YOU POSSES BUT AT THE AMOUNT OF $ YOU INVESTED.
1 Like
1 luna = 1 luna
1 ust = 1 usd
1 Luna = 1 Luna,
But 1UST is not backed by 1 USD…
Those of us who averaged down using wormhole during the attack shouldn’t be punished. We averaged down significantly. From .02 to .000003. Such an arbitrary heuristic is ridiculous. LUNA should be burned with whale taxes that discourage sell-offs plain and simple.
1 Like