How is it guaranteed that the issuing entity of digital identities will not save user data and addresses before encrypting them?
How is anything in life guaranteed? I’ll put more thought and research into your question and get back to it soon.
we don’t care to be register. decentralised is not mean be unidentified. wake up. blockchain is eternally linked. we honest don’t care about that.
1 Like
That’s not the problem. That data may be sold to other entities. The issuing entity in charge of creating the digital identity could sell that data to generate a profit.
How is it guaranteed that our data is safe?
It would be best that the data is deleted once the issuing entity verifies our real identity with some state document or passport
verify that it is a real person > create the digital identity > deliver the digital identity to the corresponding address > delete the data
make sure that the digital identity cannot be transferred (That it is linked to that address)
2 Likes
This is an open proposal to the entire community and its value is unique.
That is why I am glad that you are here with us to discuss the details in an open manner. As for the identity, YES you have to minimize the possibility of revealing it, it has to be confidential! What about the community portfolio and people appointed as ambassadors to represent the interests of the community. Such persons must be transparent and have a clean slate. Only in this way will we build the trust of the community. Data theft and distribution should be punished as willful burglary.
I have my hand on the trigger to put this proposal to the vote, after detailed discussion and fine-tuning of this proposal. I have 4,000,000 lunc for a this thing.
LUNC <= LUNO => LOGO
1 Like
We should not rely on trusting others - we should use trust-less codes to privately collect the unique data that links real unique identities (using a document verification process connected to the official passport/ID card system) to ‘governing wallets’ and then auto-erase most the data and all the connections of that data to the corresponding ‘governing wallets’ after the identities are confirmed and the wallets have been created.
To ensure that a unique identity doesn’t create more than a single (1) wallet, shards of unique data must be kept. Through the use of zero-knowledge proof, those shards can prevent unique identities from creating multiple wallets by proving those identities already have a ‘governing wallet’ without releasing any private data to the public.
Those shards of data will remain in the system, protected by zero-knowledge proof, disconnected from the corresponding wallets. So, if the shards of data were compromised and declassified, the wallets associated with them would already be disconnected from them resulting in account privacy protection.
The remaining question is: How do we prevent people from buying/selling the keys to ‘governing wallets’? Those transactions could lead to the centralization of governing power in the Terra Classic ecosystem.
We need to be caution and take identity seriously because i think one day social ranking program can be nice to determinate rightness society.
Of course who work is better then who rob.
Of course who study, invent, generate a better world deserve better.
So we need to have under count everything.
Anyway this world, without be under control can go to chaos.
Remember that: human is easy to control and some of it like to have easy access to everything.
We need to protect our system and made it right.
No problem to release passport or document.
1 Like
If there ever was a social ranking program, it would also have to be trust-less code (not humans) enforcing the ranking based on community governance (passed proposal) guidelines.
1 Like
I am thinking of a system - a programme whose overriding priority, is to protect user data. Only a machine can be objective and carry out the programme without any reservations. This program would be permanently implemented in the block kernel and that would be something - on a global scale. Nobody has this yet. Such a solution would allow us to catch up with the future in a short period of time and to gain - regain the trust of current and future users, which is the most important thing.
2 Likes
A central code built into every Terra Station (dapp version) that controls all the connected decentralized nodes (dapp stations), (all nodes synced to the same community authorized code) updated from a central location (authorized coder’(s) ‘ dapp) that updates all nodes only after passing of governing proposals (double layered).
Access to make adjustments should have oversight too (all activity visible ~ in real time) through the terra station dapp connected to all other station dapps (nodes) that are connected through an internet connection (others updated when they connect). Unique identity access to coding manipulation would be granted by government ~ coder info (Terra Station ID) included in the governance proposal.
This would require an access point to the core code in all Terra Stations. The code manipulatable on all Terra Stations. Those with access to manipulate it (through their unique Station dapp) would do so following government direction (seen in live time by all others without that manipulative access) and once update is completed on the node with ‘manipulatable’ access, another government proposal (to verify the manipulation was done correctly) should go up for votes, and if passed ~ the coder is granted another access to send the update to all nodes.
2 Likes
Sorry sir,
What’s mean “governing wallets”?
The one where we pay all together taxes for made ecosystem work?
I think this one got be not controlled from anyone.
Is this the fact.
We pool, we decide but that’s got depend from better project of course so,
we can live a better life if we integrate AI and machine learning also to verify our proposal and have effective response from all the insight.
So, we hare individual identity want to live together and we can with singularity decide for our life without make it risk to someone else.
If we want to do something bigger we need to pass some test because made a building is not mean just put cement on earth.
So we can realise together an idea and provide fund to realise.
Trust me, we had for century government was try try to “taking” care of us also investing public money for project never be completed.
Also for project without sense, just for made the world moving. Sometimes in a rushing but.
Forget about the past, taking power for this “new” world we deserve.
Perfect explanation,
simple and organized.
I can like to propose the use of terra but today we have not high trust on this project because the big loss.
I can promote a lot the use of terra, go personally into shop and company for made them use it.
We have dapps for example to suggest as e commerce forx example, restaurant?
we need also a debit card
Maybe issue that transaction card during the ID verification phase (before the user’s data is erased and the shards of that data that remain - to prevent Id’s from having more than one wallet and vote - are disconnected from the wallet to preserve anonymity.
So, only the wallet information would be associated with the card and the unique identity would still receive it at their physical home location.
1 Like
?
How can we guarantee data will be secure during the phase that the wallets and the unique ID’s are being tethered and that all the data are ‘disconnected’ from the wallets after that identity verification phase, that is meant to limit voting power, ends?
That’s the big question that will make this thread reality.
@ClaudioGranucci - The debit card will contain only our nickname and the identity associated with it will be stored by the DApp and only the machine will know it. Authorized coder’(s) 'dapp, as the only person with unique keys, will be able to operate and disclose them at the request of the owner and after the owner’s approval. It will also not be effective a tacit acceptance. It must be an unambiguous accept associated with the owner this personal daty, using passwords and access phrases known only to him. As with wallets.
LUNC <= LUNO => LOGO
1 Like
No identity data of the unique user needs to be tethered to the wallet and ‘transaction card’ - the keys alone should identify the unique wallet to keep things private. (Again), to prevent double voting - the shards of personal data (protected by zero-knowledge proof) should be completely disconnect from the unique wallets they authorized as ‘identified’ in the ID phase that turns a regular ‘staking wallet’ into a ‘governing wallet’.
Each unique and verified ‘governing wallet’ can also have a pin that can be set and changed (through the Terra Station) that protects it from unauthorized use.
Perhaps to have the debit card and remain anonymous ~ a ‘governing wallet’ will be required. The third-party developer of the card (or the community ~ not ideal because of production requirements) will need to know where to send the card.
Thank you for your commitment and open debate - the shards of personal data (protected by zero-knowledge proof) should be completely disconnect from the unique wallets they authorized as ‘identified’ in the ID phase that turns a regular ‘staking wallet’ into a ‘governing wallet’.
Each unique and verified ‘governing wallet’ can also have a pin that can be set and changed (through the Terra Station) that protects it from unauthorized use. 
The third-party developer of the card (or the community ~ not ideal because of production requirements) will need to know where to send the card… 
Not literally, because it would be a clean card, with no data. Only activation by the user, through the reader, would give the card a personality, the card itself would be anonymous and its reading would give the identification of the NICK itself. Which the user wants to use when encoding their data. The cards would be given to all wallet holders to parcel locker, without address or phone number. Receipt via a code sent to the user’s specified wallet, as a receipt code. Only possible identification by means of a government facial recognition programme, introduced during the pandemic - STARLING => Mask <= Musk - but no one believes in this yet… 
Correction:
Each ‘transaction card’ (not wallet) can also have a pin that can be set and changed (through the Terra Station) that protects it from unauthorized use.
External ID to Wallet Linking Prevention
Because of facial recognition technology, the transaction processing system should use zero-knowledge proof to verify the wallet’s address (keeping the address private when used in public) in addition to the pin to confirm the transaction to prevent unauthorized use of the ‘transaction card’.
The ‘transaction cards’ (held by buyers) and ‘transaction receivers’ (held by merchants) should be designed and monitored by the community through the Terra Station (like the core should be) ~ authorization to build in the designated space (in the station) and manipulate the design, when necessary, should be granted the same way the core code manipulations are granted (double layered voting process ~ initial design check & implementation authorization).
Finding a third party to produce the physical cards (with the necessary data installed on them to connect to and communicate with the station) and the receivers (also connected to and communicating with the station) would be another necessary task in this project. Or, start with dapps on smartphones that scan QR wallet codes (protected by zero-knowledge proof) to complete transactions. Maybe that’s the best way to transact? We can build that into our core too.
Of course, this project is further down on this community’s to-do-list.
1 Like
Or, start with dapps on smartphones that scan QR wallet codes (protected by zero-knowledge proof) to complete transactions. Great concept - I will support it
LUNC <= LUNO => LOGO
simple thing is the best… always
LUNO reverse
2 Likes