Any serious news from adult people?
1 Like
lolā¦Some of the comments here do make you wonder about the age of some of these foolsā¦Or at the very least their mental age
3 Likes
āAdultā in this context means, in a manner that is both coherent and adds relevant data to the conversation so as to shed light on current eventsā¦ In this case, typing out nonsense and acting a fool that does not help the current situation is hardly going to be categorized as āadultāā¦
4 Likes
Even CZ is making a statement about LUNA Burn, for this proposal. But no one in Terra authority gives us information. Who is communicating with the exchanges? You did Do Kwonās fork quickly. Why is 1.2% Tax & Burn a problem?
1 Like
It will take time for this to be implemented seeing as LFG is no longer leading the charge in development. The devs working on implementing any proposals arenāt necessarily paid to develop the blockchain.
Patience. At the current rate, the price for LUNA (v2) and LUNC will meet in no time.
Then you can lay back and enjoy watching Do Kwon and his minions cry.
3 Likes
CZ, where? CZ active cover sca m 2.0, and ignored 1.0 proposals.
What are you trying to say? Why LUNC was listed then on Binance ?
Why make a statement of support to the community?
CZ complained that there was no interlocutor.
I think you confused it with Do Kwon. Heās the one who wants to destroy LUNCā¦
2 Likes
@Detox Dear Detox, tell me why would Do won or somebody else from TFL want to destroy LUNC. Even LUNA(v2) has itĀ“s price affected by LUNC and USTC price. When some of older coins price drop LUNA(v2) also price drop, when it bull itĀ“s price LUNA(v2) also bull itĀ“s price. Please understand market first, before you say something like this.
Why hasnāt he made a statement about LUNC for weeks? If thatās not treason, what is?
Do Kwon doesnāt care about any LUNC owner/victim. He wants all the attention on LUNA because he got it from the air.
We bought V1 LUNA and became victims. All he did was profit from it.
In fact, the name LUNA doesnāt even belong to him. He even stole it from us victims
Whose loss is covered with this ridiculous fork?
Who filled your pocket?
What amazing project did they start? ā¦
Do Kwon doesnāt care about LUNC and youāre defending it, Iām astoundedā¦
Immediately announced his own fork proposal, contacted exchanges and implemented. Why not contact the community or exchanges now. Why didnāt just explain a single line for 1.2% burn or about LUNC ?
Tell your rescuer to take a minute to tweet about LUNC. He doesnāt because he owns a V2 LUNA.
But LUNA wonāt move forward until LUNC is rescued, and no one will trust him. say this tooā¦
1 Like
Why isnāt a study conducted in line with the wishes of the investors? . The investor wants lunaclassic to burn with the burning mechanism.we are doing one authoritative study, why doesnāt she say about this?
1 Like
we want good news ā¦ itās not very difficult
Enthusiasm is goneā¦ Not that there was much to begin withā¦
I donāt know about everyone else, but I donāt have the time to sit around for thousands of years to burn the excess at the rate it is goingā¦ Iād gone all moldy by thenā¦
But is the burn thing going to happen or not? If it is, when can we expect it? Donāt give us some runaround story that āwe are working on itā, as we have done heard this for how long now? Because we havenāt seen anything recently indicating it will ever get implementedā¦ . If itās not going to happen, donāt give people false hope by hyping it up to those who donāt know any better so they all gamble money they canāt afford to loseā¦
So the question isā¦ Is it ever really going to happen? Or is it just a pipe dream?
1 Like
proposal 4080 has already been implemented and is working. Itās enough.
We all want it, but no one listens to us.
Proposal 4080 enough? Does anyone even math anymore?
How much has proposal 4080 burned in the last month? Because even if they were somehow able to burn one billion per day, which they have yet to do, that is still like 180 yearsā¦ They would have to burn a minimum of 5 billion every day to burn the entire excess in most peoples lifetimeā¦ Ill be in my 70s, as 5 billion would still requite 35 yearsā¦ Itās a delusion that with burning a few million a month is going to burn enough LUNC to make a difference in anybody who is reading this life timeā¦ They are going to have to pull something big out of their rear if they hope to do anything about the trillions in excessā¦ Unless they can surpass 15 billion daily, it is a deceased idea with no grounding in realityā¦ And that is still 12 years of burningā¦
The biggest problem is, we got people who do not grasp how big a number a trillion is, much less 6.5 trillionā¦
2 Likes
Believe me, friend, if they donāt burn their coins in half a year or a year and donāt raise the price by 30-40 cents, then consider that this ecosystem will no longer exist, neither LUNC nor LUNA2.0! From the beginning, they must win the trust of the people by restoring LUNC, and only then build 2.0!
2 Likes
More than 1 month is completed but 1.2% tax burn is not implemented, there is no expected report that all community lose there funds when 1.2% tax burning starts properly. If crypto market starts burning 1.2% sooner than all community will start investing in crypto again
So Please All Community Ready To Accept 1.2% Burning Start Burning 1.2% Tax.
2 Likes
Please donāt forget to influence however you can existing (pre-depeg) LUNC stakers to give more voting power (>67%) to the current LUNC-friendly Validators (see attached) we need that to gracefully unlock staking and enable the burn as per 3568/4095 via the TR code release.
RedelegationCandidates.pdf
Just 1b burned. Need put 1.2% soon. Need cover this by Binance.