Would you support the proposal if it went live for voting
- Yes
- No
0 voters
Lmao… so let them pay for it.
1 Like
So you dont want to support a project that is gonna solve luna classic biggest issue. the level entitlement of some these replies, like how dare you ask us to be selfless and help those who want to help us. we want others to the leg work while we sit on our bottoms doing nothing and reaping the rewards. what a sad bunch of replies from members of community. this type of mentality will make us stay where we are and never progress, and they say im too sensitive lmao. So rabbi do you want them to massage you while you cry about tgf and l1 team, will that make you happy.
This is making guarantees.
Explain it.
No selfishness there when it’s not the projects money nor LUNC/USTC being burned.
It is exactly your attempt, no? You have given no explanation for the continued success of the project - merely saying DYOR. What makes folks ape in? An audit gives you some users, not the whole segment.
And even for that you made the most laziest prop with an attitude that it should be so obvious.
Heck. Maybe it would make that old goat happy, but it doesn’t exactly solve any of the issues raised so far.
And as you keep saying over and over again how this is a discussion on how to make the proposal better, you really don’t take any constructive or non-constructive criticism into account.
Wonder if it’s a you problem or a governance problem?
“This is making guarantees.
Explain it.”
They already burned 1.5 billion and continuing, people want to participate after an audit, what more guarantees do you want. you keep on repeating this like you have an argument, either come up with something new or please vote no and leave, save me from your constant torment.
“No selfishness there when it’s not the projects money nor LUNC/USTC being burned.”
See this type reply is really showing me that you just want to argue you and dont want to even search how much they burned on your phone, you keep on going in circles and yes it’s not the project money like i made this proposal to ask the community for community pool money ,lmao you think you’re smart be you just made yourself look like a fool.
“It is exactly your attempt, no? You have given no explanation for the continued success of the project - merely saying DYOR. What makes folks ape in? An audit gives you some users, not the whole segment.
And even for that you made the most laziest prop with an attitude that it should be so obvious.”
Lmao my god why did you send this guy did i not pray enough. Some community members are cautiously participating but want to go all in while others are waiting for the audit to get their feet wet, that is why the burns are continuing. “What makes folks ape in?” To burn the supply do you have a gold fish memory, do i have to drill that in your head for you to finally get it. “An audit gives you some users, not the whole segment.” And you know this how. you refuse to research the project yet you claim to know what will and what will not happen. stop embarrassing yourself and go comment on other proposal but i appreciate your vote. Please vote no and leave 
.
“And even for that you made the most laziest prop with an attitude that it should be so obvious.”
Because it’s that simple there is nothing to hide this not a software proposal it’s just a request for fund that benefit us greatly and when i say dyor i want you to go and hear it from the source not from me so you would be more confident about your vote when the proposal goes live.
“And as you keep saying over and over again how this is a discussion on how to make the proposal better, you really don’t take any constructive or non-constructive criticism into account.”
I’ll happy to take it if you have something smart to say which you have not done so far you even refuse to look how much they burned which you can find out about it on your phone. if you want to criticism me fine but at least have some solid ground to stand on.
You see i made yes or no poll if the majority vote no the proposal will not go live. This should make you happy and also make your old goat friend happy too. Thanks you for your constructive or non-constructive criticism.
1 Like
People don’t worry im not gonna terra rebel you, what i wrote here is exactly what will happen no hidden agenda. if the majority vote yes i will contact certik for an audit and ask them for wallet address and when the proposal goes live you can take the wallet addresse and verify it with them.
My hands was forced to do this because of the state we are in right now and i apologize if anyone felt offended by my behavior but i just reached my wits end.
1 Like
Well, I am making a dashboard to view burns, including contract burns. That should be up today though it will take some time parse the data and display the entire picture.
DFLunc hasn’t been burning for long so their data should be in the beginning of the sequence.
If that is parsed in 24-48 hours then we will be able to see what they have burnt till now. Accordingly, the community can take an informed decision on whether or not to go ahead with this.
1 Like
36k so L2 can maybe get more traction.
36k burns roughly 3.204 billion LUNC at these market prices.
You are making a prediction on hopes that more investors pile in without any sort of numbers to back up your hopes.
You aren’t giving arguments, but a broad, hope filled idea. And you assume the audit is a positive one.
I know how much they have burned. But it wasn’t from their pockets only.
It came from you and all the others and you are asking more of the funds here from others.
You don’t even know the mechanisms behind it, do you? Have you done dyor?
That simply the answer is no. Put up a prop. It’s only a handful of LUNC. It’s that simple.
Supply is in trillions. They burned 1.8b so far. That is remarkable, but charts are showing me a decline in DFC, since there’s only so many willing to lose their LUNC that they are already under water with.
Just to gain something they aren’t even understanding. And if they have a spokesperson who also has no earthly idea why folks should put up their LUNC, besides “it burns” then I’m sorry - are you not still understanding how markets work?
"36k so L2 can maybe get more traction.
36k burns roughly 3.204 billion LUNC at these market prices.
You are making a prediction on hopes that more investors pile in without any sort of numbers to back up your hopes.
You aren’t giving arguments, but a broad, hope filled idea. And you assume the audit is a positive one."
36k at current market prices is around 427 million not 3.204 billion get your facts straight before embarrassing yourself. Not a prediction but reality, if you think that then do a poll on Twitter or any other place where the majority of the lunc community are and see for yourself do not take my word for it. Then do you have a better idea for reducing the supply. You keep on attacking but you aren’t giving any solutions. I mean lebun, strathcole, happy cat crypto all said the burns are legit and until now no one have come forward with any evidence of them being a scam.
" I know how much they have burned. But it wasn’t from their pockets only.
It came from you and all the others and you are asking more of the funds here from others"
Then how are you gonna burn the supply, by force do you think before typing. Have you not read what cz wrote or said in the podcast that you cannot force something on others when people asked him about applying 1.2 tax.
“You don’t even know the mechanisms behind it, do you? Have you done dyor?”
I’ll simplify it for you, you burn 1 batch which cost 5k lunc 5 ustc to mine dfc the lunc goes straight to burn wallet by users not dflunc.
To calculate the amount of dfc you get you use a formula : number of batches you burned/ total amount of batches burned in current cycle* total amount of dfc minted in the current cycle and each cycle start at 14:00 utc there are only 50.1 million tokens and each cycle is released with 0.2 decresed rate based on previous cycle.
“That simply the answer is no. Put up a prop. It’s only a handful of LUNC. It’s that simple.”
Where is the complexity in what i proposed please elaborate further i wanna get your perspective.
“Supply is in trillions. They burned 1.8b so far. That is remarkable, but charts are showing me a decline in DFC, since there’s only so many willing to lose their LUNC that they are already under water with.
Just to gain something they aren’t even understanding. And if they have a spokesperson who also has no earthly idea why folks should put up their LUNC, besides “it burns” then I’m sorry - are you not still understanding how markets work?”
The embarrassment keep on going they burned 1.5 billion not 1.8 billion if wanna criticism me please check before writing you just keep on refusing to do proper research and just want to attack because you got offended by my attitude. Have you burned 1.5 billion out of your own pocket and what is your long term plan with lunc if the supply doesn’t decreases, you sound like you have an idea. I dont understand
what you meant with Dfc supply Decline can you expand on this. You get rewarded for burning that is the only way to incentive holders to burn.
You are correct. Was calculating with five zeroes.
But 427m is roughly ~45% of community pool.
You feeling sure in draining CP for that project?
You are here proposing for the governance. If you want your prop to have any chance besides a firm Veto - you need to do your part.
If i vote whats in front of my eyes then all I see is a one tight lipped burn happy fan of DFLunc, who doesn’t know what the projects long term sustainability could even be.
See, a spend proposal has that address and the owner attached or it is handled by a mediatory party.
This sort of information is also what you are lacking in your proposal.
Like I said - I am giving you critique on the prop since supposedly you asked for it, yet you aren’t really actually taking anything into account since in your mind it’s simple.
Drain Terra Classic Community Pool. Get audit. Get DfLunc price up. ???. Profit.
So simple.
“You are correct. Was calculating with five zeroes.
But 427m is roughly ~45% of community pool.
You feeling sure in draining CP for that project?”
100 percent
“You are here proposing for the governance. If you want your prop to have any chance besides a firm Veto - you need to do your part.
If i vote whats in front of my eyes then all I see is a one tight lipped burn happy fan of DFLunc, who doesn’t know what the projects long term sustainability could even be.”
I mean look at it from my perspective they suddenly appeared out of nowhere with full on transparency multiple known trusted community members vouched for the burns, they reward you for participating so its either a scam or they are working on the behalf of a big entity that wants to help the community but not directly.
"See, a spend proposal has that address and the owner attached or it is handled by a mediatory party.
This sort of information is also what you are lacking in your proposal.
Like I said - I am giving you critique on the prop since supposedly you asked for it, yet you aren’t really actually taking anything into account since in your mind it’s simple.
Drain Terra Classic Community Pool. Get audit. Get DfLunc price up. ???. Profit.
So simple."
Once the community chooses which one receive the fund either dflunc or certik I’ll will start working on the voting proposal and add the wallet addresse in the recipient blank.
They have a mechanism to collect but if you look at the rate the wallet is getting it will take ages and we dont want to waste more time. they said they are willing to do audit
lunc give in…time is closing in
They didn’t pay any crypto youtuber to promote their project like terraport did they promoted themselves through data. They want to collaborate with mr Edward kim on the testnet airdrop because they want luna classic to actually succeed
Yes. You have convinced me!
Just fund the proposal and get it to voting now. Time is of the essence.
Dyor on the docs about if veto or less then 40% vote occurs. 
This may be a little weird, but this 3ABD guy sounds exactly of LUNCWIN. The guy that had his casino “idea” stolen by rexyz. Please DYOR, this picture was taken from owldao’s twitter. It’s a redflag if this project starts trying to sell tokens.
Again, I am speculating and this is not solid evidence. It’s something to be wary of though.
“Just fund the proposal and get it to voting now. Time is of the essence.”
LMAO how do you fund the proposal before voting. Trying to be sarcastic but you made yourself look like an idiot. Stop embarrassing yourself and go bother other proposals. Have some self respect for god sake.
Wow rexx you caught me red handed you should leave crypto and apply to become an investigator lol any update on terraport situation.
Meh, you’re most likely not going to get funded from the CP for a certik audit as there isn’t much support for this proposal. I suggest giving up and have the project raise their own funds to pay for the audit.
I’m done with helping terraport. There’s no more information that I can provide for the incident.
“I’m done with helping terraport”
Is this an admission from you that you worked with terraport on the scam? This is pure speculation, no hard evidence LMAO.
If i dont get the funding for it then it’s fine by me, no worries.
I bet that terra rebels shade cut deep, huh?
So salty, did you actually think we would pay for this? 
Not our responsibility 