Distribute the $4M in Off-Chain Community Assets Towards LUNC’s Revitalization

The Vegas proposal referred to in my first comment above is as follows :point_up_2:

The Vegas proposal referred to in my first comment above is as follows

Compare and comment. I support the vote and the power of decision by the community. Not centralization of funds. Less so without any details of how the funds are managed. Just “statements of good intentions”. Nothing that can be reliably verified. Nor any commitment of tasks to be carried out in the future. Just statements. And allocation of discretionary funds to a group of people.

Of course, there are always the “political” applauders, without any justification as to why they agree. Just “very good proposal”… “I support this proposal”… “a great person” and other qualifiers. Nothing of solid foundations that support the proposals that are applauded. :grin: :grin: :grin: :grin: