There will always be an exchange catering to the needs and there will always be buyers/sellers.
This proposal schools CEXs to stop doing things at will and follow the blockchain passed proposals.
In my opinion, 1.2%(not 0.2%) should have been done long back onchain+offchain.
Its economics-supply reduces,prices rise.
Assumptions like this led to Binance halting and cutting burns in half… just saying
This is very bold move for LUNC community to implement blacklisting wallets for income transactions. Idea is good, BUT… Reaction of exchanges can be unpredictable, and some exchanges can see this as a thread move from LUNC community. We need to carefully think about proposing that, and it should be discussed first as “possible to implement feature” with some representatives from exchanges. I don’t believe in “95% success chance of CZ agreement of implementation” that author of medium article is trying to convince us. For now ABSTAIN
I fully support the 1% MAX fee validator plan.
The first step to break the deadlock.
but I propose to slightly change the very essence of the requirements for exchanges.
I propose to force all exchanges (by any means, up to blocking the address) to abandon the MEMO label and each account on the exchange should be linked to a real address in the lunc blockchain.
If this plan of mine is implemented, then there will be no need to argue with exchanges, and all transactions on exchanges will take place in the blockchain and will be subject to burning, and the lunc community will be able to change the percentage of burning, if necessary, regardless of the consent or disagreement of the exchanges.
I entrust this idea to the validator of 1% MAX fee, and if he is interested in it, he can apply it on his own behalf.
Because most validators vote ‘Against’ any proposal to increase taxes. You can open any proposal to raise taxes and see their list. I recommend delegating your coins to a validator that supports burning if you also want to increase the tax.
YES! This solution can significantly improve the performance and scalability of the network, as well as enhance its security.
incentives and whitelists first, then blacklists if that fails
I love this communist approach, let’s force them at Gunpoint.
LUNC is pretty much d3ad at this point, the L1 Grift Force haven’t added any value in months and they won’t in the future either. The people “in charge” of LUNC (TGF, L1JTF, top validators) have 0 long-term plan, vision, or any idea on how to pump the price. Ergo, desperate times call for desperate measures - might as well try to strongarm CEXs into compliance… LUNC is bleeding out to death and if something’s not done fast it’ll keep hemorrhaging until there’s no liquidity or volume left.
I don’t know a chain that asks for developers to move the price upwards.
It is the investors who vote with their money on how they feel about the upgrades or if they don’t care at all.
I keep seeing these accusations and they are just as baffling every time.
I don’t know a chain that does NOT invest in marketing of the brand, hackathons, meetups, etc.
When there were multiple plans to make that possible, again, there was no enthusiasm or interest shown towards all those quintessential aspects of business.
There was a lot of excitement shown towards the various L1 teams and their grifters. So, we need to ask them now.
Are they happy with the money they have received or do they want more?
If they are happy, then why are the prices like this?
Evidently, you guys did NOT fund any other plan that could provide liquidity to the blockchain, so why DON’T we ask the L1 Teams and their grifters these questions?!
You know many chains that crashed and random volunteers took it on with no money?
If there is NO money, then why don’t you ask the L1 Team, TR and the others to upload text proposals rather than spending props?
If there is NO money, why are they developing for a chain for free?
If there is NO money, what the hell are you doing there? Why don’t you go to a chain which has money?
why don’t you kk kk kk
Cause I know that there is money 
I am not going anywhere, no matter how much the Luna 2.0 a-holes here try to make me.
I forgot your heritage.
See, in the world of crypto - a few million is same as having no money for a sustainable chain.
Whatever your beef now that you have been rejected from the projects funded - You speak no sense with this childish babble of whom has done what.
But rest in peace knowing that all of the projects involved have done actual work and provided a service that passed governance.
It is really that simple. Get rejected since you rushed your competing prop out of lunacy or trying to hop on a hype train to moneytown, promising absurd numbers out of thin air, while there was an actual proposal that did due diligence and is more than one Indian grifters lucid dream of easy money.
Oh and a…Luna 2 doesn’t give two sh*ts about you. Stop making yourself something more than you are since you feel emasculated by this scary outside world.
You’re just an ol’ hag who has absolutely zero acceptance in the community.
Make yourself useful and people will reach out to you instead of reaching out to me for questions related to the blockchain (and I won’t tell you what they are telling me 
).
That how it works bro.
Yes. Best keep quiet about the voices in your head.
That’s literally their only job. Even moreso if they’re the only ones being allowed to work on LUNC (since any other team that tries gets shut down immediately, either by Allnodes/validators tanking their prop, or Steve himself poaching deliverables from their roadmap/list).
I stand by what I said - the L1 Grift Force is a worthless blight on LUNC.
I mean, I don’t care about your feelings towards L1 or any other team.
The notion that L1 has to move prices is simply out of my scope of reality. I know of new users to crypto, not understanding arses end of what any of this does, but the core sleek code or optimised transaction speed or low cost of transaction is not what attracts price action.
You believe L1 should be doing what? You even wrote and pushed for an alternative team whos job description was the same.
ETH is slower, gas fees are absurd, L1 work is still behind where it should be, but it’s the biggest chain in the world by users.
227m or so folks are on Ethereum and it’s millions of dapps.
It’s not the developers who make the chain. It’s the users. It’s the use case. You.