Are you sure Bilbo was shut down because he only wanted to work on the chain?!?
Maybe it happened because he was affiliated to you and adopted the very same disruptive approach…
Oh, Aaron …
Yes. Ideally we’d have multiple dev teams working on the chain. This nonsense there should only ever be 1 crew is just so the TGF can retain full control of development. You have to be blind not to see this.
No. You put too much emphasis on form, and not enough on function. No one who criticizes the TGF does it just for fun or out of spite - it’s been 4 months of continual fuckups on their part, enough is enough already. I started as a supporter of the TGF back when Ed had launched the org, but it’s now taken over the chain and is keeping anyone else from contributing to it. And Bilbo doesn’t go nearly as hard on the TGF as I do, yet they shut out his entire 5/5 team (don’t give me any shit about them being un-KYC’d or sockpuppets, Steve’s clowns are likewise not doxxed and he’s refusing to submit the senior Cosmos dev’s Github… Superman is also still missing, and likely won’t return).
Fact of the matter is, TGF refuses to cede control. Ed has pretty much centralized LUNC around the TGF - everything has to go through them now, and validators refuse to let anything important pass if it’s not directly from the TGF (you can see this happening with the current example of the MARS-LUNC prop and the no canon repo prop - both are undeniably positive changes for the chain, but validators refuse to even vote on them because the TGF hasn’t sanctioned it).
LUNC is pretty much owned and controlled by TGF + Allnodes (and their client validator list).
1 Like
When voting?
1 Like
I like the idea of incentivizing/rewarding exchanges rather than punishing them.
1 Like