Consider that if Ozone is designed to solve problems of potential technical risk, would it not be prudent to deploy the insurance protocol on a different secure blockchain or chains?
I have no idea what the technical limitations are but it would seem to me that Ozone now is similar to putting your insurance policy in the same vault as the thing you are trying to insure. Ozone would seemingly have the same systemic risk as anchor?
Consider FDIC insurance… it is exactly in the time of massive national emergency and a “bank run” that it is unlikely that you will get your bank balance fixed if banks run out of cash.
It seems like ozone should be in a different bank. Perhaps technical limitations are a problem?