Is this person real?
https://twitter.com/asparagoid
If heās going to be a any factor in the whole story, Iām out. It is enough for a smart person to see this creature to make everything clear to him.
I recognise that twitter handle as a notorious shitposter
Simply ask them handover luna classic to community developer and we will choose accordingly
Who is the community Developer?
People dont forget to bump Burn and Remedy proposal part 2 since its the one that is updated, so people can have a better understanding. #BurnLUNA
Pls vote
Just so everyone knows. Iām bumping again. Here is the Telegram Group for everyone to get together against Fork and Censorship
This is the official telegram group for decentralised goals of LUNC and UST
I donāt believe that is real. Someone has way too much time on their hands.
1 Like
Hi there, Iām 100% sure itās not possible to take crypto from Revolut to another wallet,
Best
Thatās the plan. But I also think we need to burn all the coins in Kwonās wallet. Last week he staked tons of freely printed Luna in order to control the network so we need to reverse that action.
3 Likes
agree. since do kwon abandoned this chain, we should burn all their assets
2 Likes
guys spread the word about this proposal if you like
Full disclosure, I am a (small) holder from before the āattackā (coordinated exit, whatever you want to call it). Iāve spent the last 8 days, essentially 15-20 hours per day, poring over every proposal, comment, theory, tweet, etcā¦ Obviously, no single proposal is perfect for everyone, and it seems as though the wheels are in motion to establish Luna V.2 via fork (and were in motion even prior to the final vote). That is all fine and dandy, however DK (and the validator/dev team/LFG), should grant those who want a different course of action (whether it be burn or some other remedy), the ability to pursue our own course. With that being said, I believe the community to begin to shift their attention to LUNA (classic) post-DK (PDK) in order to achieve whatever goals weāre hoping to achieve via an actual democratic voting method. We need a new community led leadership team, devs, a new governance model, etc. This is no small task.
Many people will recommend CZ (due to his favoring of the āburnā vs. fork), and obviously he would be a top choice, however Iām not sure he has the time, interest, or wants to become involved in this matter any more than they have already dragged him in. It could also be viewed as a potential conflict of interest. Even more so, it is quite apparent that DKs move to fork is a not-so-apparent attempt to spite CZs proposal. Why? Jealously Iām guessing.
People may scoff at this, however a leadership member (or former member) of either the DOGE or SHIB team may be willing to become a charter āpartnersā/foundational members for LUNA Classic (as it is now known). Say what you want about these āmemeā coins, their governance model truly functions at the will of the holders.
Finally, what is the path forward? Again, that would be for the community/holders to decide via new governance model. However, I think some things are apparent:
UST must be depegged/abandoned. An algorithmic stable coin was never the answer, and will be of no use if still āweighing downā Luna Classic (LUNC). LFG is working to compensate the UST holders, as is the āairdropā for Luna V.2. Any other compensation would be the responsibility of DK, LFG, and their new creation (V.2), or by any other legal means. The point is, LUNC cannot be weighed down by DKās baggage. They are pursuing another path (V.2 fork), and it is his/LFGās responsibility to make them whole.
There must be a burn. Iāve read many comments saying āthere is no money, any remaining holdings of LFG will go to UST holdersā. That is great, and as it should. This is where we can implement the staggered transaction tax (staggered in terms of amount, rate and time). What exactly those numbers will be, can be determined with new governance model.
So, obviously this proposal doesnāt have the votes to pass āas isā, however it set a wonderful foundation for the future of LUNC (Luna Classic), which we should now be focused on pursuing as a new, standalone entity. Again, we should prioritize recruiting/establishing a new leadership board of trusted cryptocurrency community leaders (few and far between, however as I mentioned outside of CZ and Vitalik who would have no interest, our best bet is DOGE and SHIB members). And finally, we should pursue the method we choose as community members via a new governance model/vote.
5 Likes
I support this proposal!
yeahh letās goooo !
Most of our validators have no idea. They are not voting, they are just sleeping.
3 Likes
We need validators to vote or we are goneā¦
1 Like
Open shorts for S c a m 2.0. If any exchange listing this.
Bump!
I know C++. Willing to learn. IJS
1 Like