[Proposal] BURN and REMEDY fee with each LUNA transaction πŸ’Š [PART I]

UPDATE:

"What you are going to read here is first part of the proposal. If something new will be added by the community to the proposal you will find the continuation in @bloodcurdle
thread β†’ [Proposal] BURN and REMEDY fee with each LUNA transaction [PART II]
message β†’ [Proposal] BURN and REMEDY fee with each LUNA transaction πŸ’Š [PART I] - #2322 by bloodcurdle

Please contnue with both threads to keep views going !"

@Hellothere:

β€œThe proposal belongs to everyone here. I just sit down yesterday and decided to think about the idea that could work. Then you everyone made amazing contribution to the proposal :smiley: I’ve done what I could and never expected such a big reach. Now the rest belongs to the community. I wasn’t prepared for the hates I got from some people, so I will back off a little. I’ve got family, work and life too. I need to make it going somehow. In my personal opinion this suggestion is a good direction. Hopefully do kwon and his @team will figure something out that will work for everyone, especially those who lost a lot of money and their savings. I wish the best for everyone here.”


Are you part of the community and like the direction of this proposal? Please give it a vote! :clap:

[ COMMUNITY PROPOSAL #1273 ]

YES VALIDATORS: 11 and counting ^^

Please don’t vote if you haven’t staked LUNA. People that just bought Luna say their votes are invalid, thus wasted. LINK β†’ [Proposal] BURN and REMEDY fee with each LUNA transaction πŸ’Š [PART I] - #1910 by Joe_Smith

LINK TO GOVERNENCE VOTE: :point_right: Terra Station :point_left:

LINK TO PUBLIC OPINION: :point_right: Revival Plan V2 Preliminary Vote :point_left:

Summary :open_book:

Based on our volume which is around 3B $ (last 24h) at the moment if we implemented only 3% burn tax on each buy and sell transaction we could burn around 300,000,000,000 LUNA at the time of writing this proposal (I took price of 0.0003). This burn tax could be a measure put in place until the supply is low enough for us.

What More :star_struck:

You could even implement temporary 1% of the volume going to the people that lost money during the crash. Wouldn’t that be wonderful?

Motivation :rocket:

We have huge volume that can be taken advantage of. Instead of fighting with each other we should implement some measures that could help the ecosystem.

Conversation :pray:

Please Comment What You Think and Lets Perfect This Solution Together!!!
The final decision will belong of course to the team. Lets gather here ideas that may inspire/help them in making their decision.

Graphical Representation :chart_with_upwards_trend:

  1. Mathematical formulation of the burning rate for both LUNA and UST towards achieving the targeted circulating supply β†’ LUNA and UST resurrection - Google Sheets

    INCLUDES:

    • LUNA burning Pre-Pegging to achieve a circulating supply of 1 Billion from the current circulating supply of 6.53T tokens. The burning rate is a function of the circulating supply as follows

    • UST burning Pre-Pegging to achieve a circulating supply of 750m from the current circulating supply of 11.27b tokens. The target was determined as per the available collateral of 25000 BTC valued at $750m at the current market price. The burning rate is a function of the circulating supply as follows

    • UST burning Post-Pegging as a function of the UST price to prevent and punish any future similar attacks. The lower the price gets, the higher the burning rate of the transaction. Such a hefty tax will prevent attackers from making any profits and will prevent panic sales pressure. The burning rate is a function of the UST price as follows:

    MORE DETAILED INFORMATION β†’ [Proposal] BURN and REMEDY fee with each LUNA transaction πŸ’Š [PART I] - #335 by 2071

Answers to Questions❓

  1. Would it be like Safemoon?

    No I don’t think so, but to make sure I will explain what I mean. Some people compare this tokenomics with Safemoon. It won’t be like Safemoon, because in its case all transaction fee volume is distributed between holders (fat get fatter and only part of it is burned). Here all 3% would be BURNED lowering the supply.

  2. How would that be implemented on exchange (CEXs) like binance, kucoin,etc?

    Answer 1 β†’ [Proposal] BURN and REMEDY fee with each LUNA transaction πŸ’Š [PART I] - #89 by dfunk

    Answer 2 β†’ [Proposal] BURN and REMEDY fee with each LUNA transaction πŸ’Š [PART I] - #93 by David_Wedlock

    Answer 3 β†’ [Proposal] BURN and REMEDY fee with each LUNA transaction πŸ’Š [PART I] - #94 by Jishnu_saini

Additions from Comments :link:

  1. Limit UST to LUNA conversion to certain circumstances (only possible when market cap of LUNA > number of UST, limited amount of LUNA minting per time to small percentage of market cap)
    link: [Proposal] BURN and REMEDY fee with each LUNA transaction πŸ’Š [PART I] - #23 by rescue
  1. 20% temporary fee for sale transaction and 1-2% for buying

    All in order to:

  1. β€œRolling taxes” Suggestion comes from @Jishnu_saini who send me a private message

    Ex:
    Start at 10%. Every 1.5 T burnt 1% drop in fee.

    5 T supply β†’ 9% fee
    3.5T supply β†’ 8% fee
    2T supply β†’ 7% fee
    500B supply β†’ 6%

    Now drop 1% every 100bn burnt

    400B supply β†’ 5% fee
    300B supply β†’ 4% fee
    200B supply ->3% fee
    100B supply β†’ 2% fee
    2% fee till we hit 50B supply. Then 1% till we hit 1B. Then the fee stops

    link: [Proposal] BURN and REMEDY fee with each LUNA transaction πŸ’Š [PART I] - #429 by HelloThere

  2. Small vs Higher Fee (Opinion in contrary to 3rd point here)

    β€œultimately the goal is to encourage folks to keep using Luna instead of higher taxes, just keep building more products and services to encourage it. Investors will return.”

    link: [Proposal] BURN and REMEDY fee with each LUNA transaction πŸ’Š [PART I] - #440 by yapdakilla

  3. Gas is a small computational fee that covers the cost of processing a transaction. Gas is estimated and added to every transaction in Terra Station. Any transaction that does not contain enough gas will not process. Gas on Terra works differently than it works on other blockchains:

    • Validators can set their own minimum gas fees.

    Every block, gas fees are sent to the reward pool and dispersed to validators who distribute them to delegators in the form of staking rewards.

    Similar to EIP-1559 on ethereum network, we can simply change gas fee to,
    Gas Fees = Units of Gas Used + (BaseFee)

    Where BaseFee is the tax that is directly burned. Thus all validators add a BaseFee to their gas that they burn. This would require no change in code. Validators simply agree to add a BaseFee to the gas that they agree to burn. This could be implemented immediately.

    link: [Proposal] BURN and REMEDY fee with each LUNA transaction πŸ’Š [PART I] - #1997 by ek826

  4. The tax proposed could include some sort of % fee that would go to validators. Similar bribe systems exist for example in Curve finance.

    link: [Proposal] BURN and REMEDY fee with each LUNA transaction πŸ’Š [PART I] - #2266 by Mpowski

Interesting Comments :dart:

  1. β€œAgree. Keep the existing structure in place, fix the problems to avoid a repeat, and add a transaction fee to help build reserves, burn, and for general maintenance of the ecosystem. Anything else smells like financial fraud. People using terms like β€œEquity” and β€œDebt” need to be mindful of SEC’s reach. Stick to what is in place and improve.”
    link: [Proposal] BURN and REMEDY fee with each LUNA transaction πŸ’Š [PART I] - #43 by Joe_Smith

  2. β€œWell UST seems to be benefiting from the huge transaction activities of Luna. Luna rose by 1000 percent in the last 24 hours, while UST rose by a hundred percent from about 0.09 to 0.2. I want to believe Terra Team are seeing the positive side of the whole thing and probably taking advantage of the increase in activity to come up with a more better and substantive plan. From the look of it, it is now obvious that the system can be rescued without creating a new one.”
    link: [Proposal] BURN and REMEDY fee with each LUNA transaction πŸ’Š [PART I] - #21 by Equalizer

  3. β€œI 10000% agree. This is by far the best idea I’ve come across […] there is absolutely no point in having an ecosystem where you k ill your hero product. This simple solution can avoid the mess (current and future) altogether.When market cap of LUNA becomes less than UST, UST will depeg. Some will argue what is the point of UST when it can’t be stable […] The solution to this downside is to position UST as a junk bond equivalent - in other words a riskier debt product. The risk can easily be offset by offering a higher APY compared to other stablecoins to compete in the market. It will become the choice of users if they are ok taking a higher risk for the higher return. Further mechanics could be put in place to reduce the risk such as reserves, burns, amount of luna that can be minted per x time, etc but under no circumstance should Luna be minted when market cap of luna goes below the market cap of UST. This seems like the simplest way out of this.”"
    Link to full comment: [Proposal] BURN and REMEDY fee with each LUNA transaction πŸ’Š [PART I] - #58 by dfunk

  4. " The burn needs to happen on-chain (EDIT: Safemoon somehow can). Infact based on the comments here as well as other threads, the following needs to happen:

    • Burn LUNA at a steady rate to reduce excess supply
    • Open up staking at a steady pace to increase LUNA token demand
    • Burn community UST ($1B) to reduce UST supply
    • Use BTC reserves ($1B) to reduce UST debt

    A combination of above should help increase LUNA price and market cap, while reducing UST market cap at the same time.

    Additional steps:

    • Once market cap of LUNA > market cap of UST, resume on-chain swaps and the system as usual.
    • Change the algorithm to ensure UST β†’ LUNA minting does not happen when market cap of LUNA
      is less than marketcap of UST
    • Deploy additional security measures such as rate limiting LUNA minting, additional reserves, etc"

    Link: [Proposal] BURN and REMEDY fee with each LUNA transaction πŸ’Š [PART I] - #89 by dfunk

β€œI think recovery is going to be a mid term to longer road, than a shorter one, and in some ways the longer road will allow for a healthier return. I believe that just the fact of not giving up the ship will actually work to instill some confidence in the project by others, and that confidence will regain for each inch of ground that is retaken in terms of bringing value back to the LUNA and UST, and having a more healthy reserve that can handle catastrophic events much better. I believe this is the only way that people will truly see a recovery of LUNA and UST. […] I did like that you thought through the market pressure angle for controlling high volume transactions. I think having a algorithm in the protocol for mint / burn (for exchanging), as well as selling that responds dynamically to volume (rather than a hard coded value) for the Terra blockchain would help slow down to a reasonable pace those transactions that could create a run and quick loss of confidence, but allow quicker transactions in accordance with the speed the blockchain would allow for for tiny transactions. Temporarily I believe they need either proposal 1164 or 1169 until something like that is done however.”
Link: [Proposal] BURN and REMEDY fee with each LUNA transaction πŸ’Š [PART I] - #569 by HelloThere

732 Likes
[Proposal] BURN and REMEDY fee with each LUNA transaction [PART II]
Buy Back and Burn!
Terra Ecosystem Revival Plan
Buy Back and Burn $LUNA
The only solution for a fair fork
Fix Luna - to become most robust project out here
Community against Do Kwon's plan
LUNA v2 - everyone is EQUAL!
Vote for burning Luna supply in proposal!
Fork/Snapshot/Luna 2.0 will not get listed on Binance
[Proposal] Tiered repayment: 1:1 USDC refund to all UST holders up to a certain cap per-wallet using LFG funds, favouring small wallets
NO FORK- Buy and Burn
Vote burn vs fork
Terra is important. That’s why I just nearly spent my last dollar on LUNA
Terra Ecosystem Revival Plan 2 [PASSED GOV]
Terra Ecosystem Revival Plan
How to burn
[Proposal] 8 Steps to Save Luna Now - Economic Refactoring Proposal From Industry Professionals
Terra Ecosystem Revival Plan
Does Luna has maximum supply? Will UST unpeg if Luna reach maximum supply
Terra Ecosystem Revival Plan
Terra Ecosystem Revival Plan
Terra Ecosystem Revival Plan
Proposal to Reduce the Terra Tax Rate to Zero
Can Cex use tx fee to burn Luna?
Support this post if you don't want to fork at all
Here's how to get Terra back to its glory
Buy Back and Burn $LUNA
Fork/Snapshot/Luna 2.0 will not get listed on Binance
Terra Ecosystem Revival Plan
Terra Ecosystem Revival Plan
Terra Ecosystem Revival Plan
We need to choose a Manager for the Ecosystem Revival Plan (fast)
Terra Ecosystem Revival Plan
[Proposal] Rebalance between hard core hodlers and new buyers
New luna for everybody
New luna for everybody
Terra Ecosystem Revival Plan
Fork into a new chain
New luna for everybody
Luna analyse
I'M AN EX-"WHALE". I Have 4 Kids, I Lost It All, And These Are My Thoughts
Burn the extra 6 trillion & every holder takes a proportional % haircut
Terra Ecosystem Revival Plan
Terra Ecosystem Revival Plan
[Proposal] Tiered repayment: 1:1 USDC refund to all UST holders up to a certain cap per-wallet using LFG funds, favouring small wallets
Terra Ecosystem Revival Plan
Proposal: Stop making self-serving proposals, own your mistakes and actually fix things
[Proposal] Must happen in steps...NO FORK
Luna Recovery
Terra Ecosystem Revival Plan
[Proposal] Comprehensive Go Forward Proposal
[Proposal] Tiered repayment: 1:1 USDC refund to all UST holders up to a certain cap per-wallet using LFG funds, favouring small wallets
Terra Ecosystem Revival Plan
[Proposal] Tiered repayment: 1:1 USDC refund to all UST holders up to a certain cap per-wallet using LFG funds, favouring small wallets
Restoring Terra Ecosystem by Repegging UST to a New Peg and Issuing IOU
Terra Ecosystem Revival Plan
LFG BTC Holdings flowing to exchanges
[Proposal] Help UST Pegging. Increase estimated minting capacity to $1200M
[Proposal] Burning plan, even on local exchanges and restore plan
Terra Ecosystem Revival Plan
Decide anything now or never
Terra Ecosystem Revival Plan
Terra Ecosystem Revival Plan
Agree on the reason for the fork
CZ Binance Response To Fork Plan!
Terra Ecosystem Revival Plan
Proposed Recovery Plan (Proposal 1597)
UPDATED Legally Cannot Create Fork and New Token
Anndy Lian Response to The Useless Fork Proposal!
CZ Binance #2 Response To Fork/Burn
No longer feasible to continue current chain
[Proposal] LUNA2 and UST2
Terra Ecosystem Revival Plan
LUNA Go Forward Proposal
Run the Attack in Reverse
[Proposal] Terra Reconstitution Plan | Investor Compensation and an Idea for Moving Forward
Restore the peg, heal the community, no forks needed
RUN Terra Ecosystem Revival Plan ( Very important )
[Proposal] NO NEED for a FORK - Simple Social Economics Can Solve This
Remedy proposal post closed? Pls unlock it!
Buy Back and Burn $LUNA
Terra Ecosystem Revival Plan
Stop the Censorship: Unlock FatMan's Tiered Repayment Proposal Now
Terra Ecosystem Revival Plan 2 [PASSED GOV]
Mr Do Kwon and Terra reputation
Terra Ecosystem Revival Plan 2 [PASSED GOV]
Terra Ecosystem Revival Plan 2 [PASSED GOV]
CZ Binance Response #3!
Terra Ecosystem Revival Plan 2 [PASSED GOV]
Do Kwon Proposal + Community Proposal are both possible at the same time
Revival Plan V2 Preliminary Vote
Terra Ecosystem Revival Plan 2 [PASSED GOV]
Revival Plan V2 Preliminary Vote
Proposing an Interim Gorvernance with included Burn from volume taxation
Terra Ecosystem Revival Plan 2 [PASSED GOV]
Terra Ecosystem Revival Plan 2 [PASSED GOV]
Terra Ecosystem Revival Plan 2 [PASSED GOV]
Terra Ecosystem Revival Plan 2 [PASSED GOV]
Terra Ecosystem Revival Plan 2 [PASSED GOV]
Terra Ecosystem Revival Plan 2 [PASSED GOV]
General sleep LUNA
[Prop 1691] Terra v2.2: A Fair 11-point Confidence Restoration Plan for the Terra Enterprise
[Call to Action] Veto Kwon's Revival Plan and Whitelist the BURN and REMEDY Proposal
An Appeal to Terraform Labs and Terra Builders Alliance
Burn Then Fork
LUNC & USTC Rebuild Road Map Proposal
Give symbolic vote for proposal 1862
Proposed Recovery Plan (Proposal 1597)
Killing the Tax - Proposal for 0% Burn tax Parameter change
To support burning: call to organize and raise money
Save Luna, not UST
Terra Ecosystem Revival Plan
A Sensible Decision-making Framework
Terra Ecosystem Revival Plan
Terra Ecosystem Revival Plan
Luna Recovery
Terra Ecosystem Revival Plan
Luna mc > ust mc
[Proposal] Forget UST, save LUNA
The only solution for a fair fork
CZ Binance Response To Fork Plan!
A New chain, a new hope for the community (not a fork)
Add a significant tax to all trades of $luna to burn supply
Terra Ecosystem Revival Plan
Terra Ecosystem Revival Plan
Terra Ecosystem Revival Plan
[Proposal] 8 Steps to Save Luna Now - Economic Refactoring Proposal From Industry Professionals
[Proposal] Equal Airdrop for Hodlers
Proposal to: NOT RUSH the decision .. let's gather our thoughts and be smart about this
Community against Do Kwon's plan
CZ Binance Response To Fork Plan!

I think this is a great idea. In fact, nothing may be needed except to limit UST to ($1 worth of) LUNA conversion only when market cap of LUNA > market cap of UST to dig out of this whole mess.

And of course put some other limits as training wheels (like limit amount of LUNA that can be minted per X time) for now.

But we might see organic re-peg if we can get crowdsourced LUNA buying.

108 Likes

Yea just code that with each buy/sell %1 Luna and UST burns

48 Likes

The matter of how the tax proportion would look like can be discussed later. For now lets think if this solution could help us solve our current problems. I think it is a way to make everyone happy.

60 Likes

100% agree with you, thats the only solution that makes sense.

84 Likes

folks who lost money can easily DCA now and make much more on the comeback rather than asking for bailouts.

54 Likes

Also this solution does not require selling LFG BTC holdings etc…can be used to fund other projects which increases trading volume

30 Likes

to be honest I don’t know why they continue minting lunas, It is unacceptable, not even the central bank of Venezuela has such a ridiculous expansive dynamic.

22 Likes

to support UST peg. but minting has stopped now

11 Likes

Since UST is being abandoned we can go in the new direction. This tax is a way imo.

23 Likes

no stopped, I’m looking at numbers, supply continue grow.

6 Likes

LUNA does?

2 Likes

supply already stopped increasing at 6.9T

11 Likes

it’ll be silly not to take advantage of current astronomical trading volumes. CZ is right. Burn and keep building

45 Likes

Hope many more people will see this post

15 Likes

I like this idea.

11 Likes

That’s a great idea. Hope the Luna team will take immediate action

11 Likes

I think this idea is the best option to solve the problem, not short time but yes medium-long time
.

17 Likes

This seems like a good idea if we can get the distribution of the volume funds to wallets that previously held $LUNA and $UST correct. Burning the excess circulation is the best way to revive $LUNA as it will drive people to invest, simply resetting is not web3 or crypto ethos. I like this plan a lot.

9 Likes

Well UST seems to be benefiting from the huge transaction activities of Luna. Luna rose by 1000 percent in the last 24 hours, while UST rose by a hundred percent from about 0.09 to 0.2. I want to believe Terra Team are seeing the positive side of the whole thing and probably taking advantage of the increase in activity to come up with a more better and substantive plan. From the look of it, it is now obvious that the system can be rescued without creating a new one.

17 Likes