Proposal For distribution of code for proposal 3568 (for the 1.2% burn) and for 4095 (re-enable delegation and staking)

Governance & Proposals
21

This great work guys,beautiful

2 Likes
22

Thanks for your effort’s, thanks everyone.

2 Likes
23

:muscle::muscle::muscle: TR :muscle::muscle::muscle: here we go.

1 Like
24

Nothing to say
Just GO for it.

2 Likes
25

Awesome. It’ll have my vote. It’s time to push on ahead.

1 Like
26

Thank you :pray:t3:

1 Like
27

Thanks for all the hard work rebels… when will this be voted upon?

1 Like
28

I support this 100%

2 Likes
29

TerraReble forever!

2 Likes
30

Well done :clap: lots of excellent work
I support this hopefully validators will too

3 Likes
31

Full support for me, thanks for hard works guys!

2 Likes
32

Thank you

1 Like
33

Thanks @godoal, yes the parameters can be adjusted via governance proposal and will be enacted automatically. The tax borrows the existing treasury tax mechanisms that were disabled in columbus-5. We essentially, turn them back on, make luna eligible for taxing, and implement an automatic burn. See the treasury documentation here, Treasury — Terra Classic Docs documentation

18 Likes
34

This is really nice but 10 days is not enough, Give them 30 days.

1 Like
35

Thank you for this suggestion, but I’m wondering why 30 days? No progress or support on classic has been offered in over 70 days… an additional 10 business days + weekend would be 82 days without support. I am open to giving more time, if more time is warranted, but this is hardly a short period of time.

14 Likes
36

10 days is enough

4 Likes
37

They have to measures the potential of bad activities/ Attacks that can cause more damage to the chain, this is still not a stable blockchain, right now pure gambling type stuff going on. Enabling staking can cause more attacks. All this problems can’t not solved within 10 days.Thank you for your service but in my opinion it will not solve in 10 days or 1 month . It is the matter of peoples safety.

38

Thank you for your concern. There is specific code that mitigates the threat of attack from two vectors. First, only existing validators can be delegated to in the first 60 days. Second no one validator can take more than 25% of the voting power. If there is another attack that needs more attention, please let us know so that we are aware and can address it. Also I can personally say if TFL comes back with a response saying they would like to help and need more time, we would not only honor that, but welcome their help wholeheartedly.

15 Likes
39

If v0.5.21 code distributed to validators is the solution of everything then why are wasting time for TFL , wheather they are already in Lawsuit and it is also a possibility That can bring legal threats to the existing validators( who passed the commitment test) . I Don’t care about what option A and what option B . I just want to know what is the safest way to run this blockchain? In which option people investment are more safe ?

3 Likes
40

A big thank you to the TerraRebels and everyone else who are trying to get TerraLunaClassic not only to survive but thrive. I see the outcome here very important not only for Luna classic but for the whole crypto world.

2 Likes