we win either way. the “if” is largely contained and mitigated. if this is the level of discussion, better not say anything. tell me with the numbers where I’m wrong, the weak points of the proposal or are you based on precocious behavior and personal intuition without going any further. Thesis: sell at the average burn price of the 10 eras before the amount of securitized taxes. if you don’t sell everything, the shares of the unsold must still be burned. if there are more taxes, the valuation and trading of these nfts increases. more volume, more taxes. let’s suppose 900,000,000 monthly lunc burnt. 80% is 720,000,000 million (must be the proceeds from the sale) 180,000,000 would continue to burn because 20% still goes to the d3ath wallet. assuming that in the end you get 1,100,000,000 from taxes of which 220,000,000 should be burned. (20%) add the sale 720,000,000 and we have a total of 940,000,000 in a month instead of 900,000,000. if the revenue turns out to be lower, the sale was good, you don’t even need to explain. consider that the increase in tax revenues hypothetically will certainly be partly due to the trading of these NFTs. the valuation of these has increased, contextually with the trading volume. you have more burns than you would have without using this system. if volume increased without counting nft trading, 20% of that is burned anyway, 80% increase (not counting nft trading) is fully offset by 250,000,000,000 lunc trading volume . assuming that (1,100,000,000-900,000,000)=200,000,000 this surplus compared to the average was not completely generated by the trading of NFTs. a trading volume of 250,000,000,000 lunc would have sufficed. because 250,000,000,000 taxed at 0.5% is 1,250,000,000 lunc. of these 1,250,000,000, 20% goes to the CP or 250,000,000 lunc. 80% or the remaining 1,000,000,000 is divided into 200,000,000 lunc burned. 800,000,000 goes to the NFts stakers. we are talking about a volume of about 250,000,000,000*0.000087=21,750,000 dollars. nothing absolutely impossible. I don’t count the fact that during the next sale the price will reflect the highest expectations. if you don’t know how to answer with numbers or arguing, get a book and start reading rather than answering me on Agora. I’m not convinced “the plan” is made by numbers. in all your messages and those of @Kryptobia , there is no sustained and argumentative reason why the proposal would not work. I’m not selling you anything, it’s something we’ll all benefit from, it’s easier to do nothing than sit at a table and think, those who try are told to shut up without even understanding what they are saying.
ridiculous behavior.
even more ridiculous, is sticking to all my words, without guessing the concept behind it and modifying any imperfections.
answer me arguing with mathematics and logic. otherwise say nothing. your replies so far have not added value to the conversation. I explained with numbers why it can work. if you think I failed to explain why it might work you certainly didn’t say why it wouldn’t work.
