So now you are going to destroy Lunc via 1.2% tax

It failed cos its a copycat of bitcoin like luna2. Simple. Roger ver is not as liked as many think. Some people call him arrogant just like do kwon ia called. This is just the simple things I mentioned.

I’m glad that you consider LUNA2 a copycat. I hate LUNA2 as much.
People should realize the crime took place here. The official name and trading ticker symbol of LUNA were stolen from V1 to V2. And most exchanges supported that.

2 Likes

Re-read the claim Lambi made.It always amazes me how more dumb people can be by replying completly outside of topic

2 Likes

Do you think its sad that you need to resort to insulting people? Are you feeling ok? Do you need help?

His claim said also, not only. Which is true because that has a role too.

at some point you get tired reading nonsense of people.
if you are not well educated how blockchain or cex operates stop making stupid claims till you educate yourself

since you say you’re so smart make a proposal to save lunc.

if you think you can’t be saved, please leave this community.

so far you are doing nothing but criticizing people who are trying to do something…

3 Likes

Than most of peoples sell coz of high tax and it will add two or 3 more 0 amd than it reduce buyback cost and burning cost

34 percent of my salary goes to tax … yes for burn

1.2% transaction tax = no big money will ever flow into LUNC eco-system… it’s gonna cost around 12000 USD to transfer 1M transaction… hmm… no thanks…

remember, good blockchain = VERY CHEAP transaction cost compared to banks

1 Like

If someone is dropping $1 Million dollars on LUNC right now, well first $12k is nothing for them. How much would it cost to move $1 Million of Etherium right now?

Second no one is dropping that kind of money unless they are a heavy financial gambler, or know something we don’t, so again that extra $12k will not stop them.

Third, ALL it takes is for LUNC to go up 2% and they are already making big money. Imagine if it goes up 10%, or more, then I am sure that $12k was well worth paying. We have had days where LUNC swings up 20% to 40% so that 1.2% is nothing.

This was never the concern mentioned above. It was how the tax will affect the Dapps, and CEX bots (ummm :roll_eyes: No one say a word). If you are going to have a tax n burn, you also need to have a plan to try to deal with these issues, you can’t just tax n burn. It could be adding code to allow it to circumvent taxes of certain transaction types, (or at least significantly lower it). You can use the tax to create a fund to pay back Dapp developers so that they balance out. Also any tax higher than 0.5% needs to be temporary and turned off or lowered once things get better.

This btw is part of the plan I submitted. It’s not a tax n burn plan it’s a rebuild plan.

4 Likes

I agree. 1-3% tax for the first time, then it will be possible to reduce.

1 Like

https://twitter.com/john_is_whale/status/1534315862215344128?s=21&t=3KYL3JS5h4YxtO_AswAAcg do just like the Orion money validator, I asked your community if you want them to vote yes on proposal 3568 to burn luna. What do you have to lose, you already have luna v2 let us try to save luna v1 everything we ask for. Terra Station

…

idiots destroying their own project …Luna will profit from your stupidity

3 Likes

So go away to your luna 2.0, she’s going to luna, right?

Hell moon, laughing a lot.

2 Likes

Please close this topic and help improve our discourse by banning user Profile - Lunc - Terra Research Forum This user’s entire participation is insult upon insult. Not that he has many words to use but enough is enough. Lets donate some Luna Classic towards his re-education summer camp but first I guess he will have to finish his primary school.

2 Likes

I disagree with banning user “Lunc”. I don’t like his choice of words. But he did offer valuable opinions.
Respect difference of opinion. Otherwise we will not have real discussions. just echo chamber.

2 Likes

You are right that different voices need be heard. I have not commented on his content ever. But a discussion is not the same as an exchange of insults. He needs to be banned for his behaviour, not for his views.

political correctness ?No thank you it only leads that idiots think they can decide.

There is a nice say in democratic countries where educated people still exist.

A professor of science and 2 drunkard are deciding how to proceed on repairing something.
The professor of science whos faculty is based on that thing has a working solution.
However these 2 drunkards have another opinion based on a TV movie.
Since they are 2 vs 1 the professor will be forced to see them proceed with their nonsense.

No diffrence on this forum.Majority have no clue how blockchain or cex work but still they want to decide with their nonsense to proceed because doing something (killing the chain) is better than nothing

2 Likes

This analogy of yours is not appropriate at all, it’s a steal and a sophistry, if you don’t like the atmosphere here, no one is forcing you, you are perfectly free to leave, it’s not a matter of political correctness, how arrogant and ignorant you are to talk about getting her to end in lunc’s governance forum. Can I talk about how I should destroy your home in your home?