关于以后的提案

Governance & Proposals
1

first of all,l will not be English。
there are currently translation tools available on
edge and chrome。

if you don’t even want to use a translation tool,it means that no one wants to see what l’m saying
Summary
首先，燃烧税使得主链流动性降低，从而严重的破坏了现有的生态。
并且，cz已经明确的提出了将不支持链下的burn tax，那么鼓动社区人员去twitter上催促，抵制也是无意义的。其他人不会因你们受到影响。

Motivation
首先是链上燃烧税，产生的结果完全不及预期。
然后是链下燃烧，已经有想当多的cex表明了坚决不支持的态度。
所以现在所发生的情况已经表明，之前做的事情已经失败了。
其次，cz所提出的投票建议，绝大的概率会失败，交易所参与购买lunc的人员肯定不会是社区内人员，而且没人会希望自己的钱每次交易会多减少1.2%，cz是基于这一点提出的，完全不可能的事情。

Proposal
所以我提议，
1.终止burn tax的提案，全面转向区块链建设以及开发，配合实际应用，增加流动性，让1.2%的tax起到作用。
2.建议将1.2%的burn tax废除，或者缩减到0.3%保护现在的链上项目。
3.通过募捐或者拉赞助获得一部分资金，开始转向项目建设，区块链开发，使得社区可以开始盈利，然后，每个月用盈利的一部分回购lunc销毁，实际上有很多代币都是这么做的，包括bnb。
这样可以绕开交易所和链上的多重限制。
4.对于ustc，目前面临着严重的法律问题，有下架的风险，如果没有法律问题，考虑优先修复ustc，不再考虑税收的方法，通过与持有现有的资金进行1:1的数额调整，恢复ustc之后可以使得lunc燃烧的更快。
如果有法律的风险，建议是放弃ustc，或者将ustc塑造成，1:1美元抵押是稳定币，抛弃算法稳定币的概念，作为盈利项目。

2

Sorry buddy, it doesn’t work when I feed the URL into google translate…

3

Hello godoal, use DeepL Translate, it worked for me.

4

Thanks that was really insightfull

5

Sounds like you are very quick to jump to conclusions!
Ref the motivation and Point 2: The tax-burn was activated less than a week ago so we need to give it time to establish a baseline as to its efficacy
Point 1: I agree with this, but it’s down to you and me to create those new dApps not the core chain developers.
Point 3: Thanks to that fees bug (from the 1.2% tax) the community pool might now have some money in its’ pockets to start thinking about funding dApp development (that you and me need to create) and code auditing
Point 4: LUNCs major utility is the algorithmic stablecoin, abolishing that idea/roadmap would make it into a regular PoS anti-inflationary coin. It is not USTC that is facing legal problems but the one that gave up on it - when it was named UST - and some members of its legacy team. USTC is owned by the LUNC (Terra Classic) community.

6

很显然，刚才暴涨是因为cz同意了tax burn。
至于，ustc，一个新闻，美国对于算法稳定币要事实两年的禁令，不知道你看没看。

7

Despite the news; we still need to give it time to establish a baseline as to its efficacy :wink: