Great proposal. Three revisions listening to and discussing with the community. Having spoken with Bilbo recently, he comes across very professional with deep insight. He also has a simplified way of explaining things in detail which I believe the community will appreciate.
I like that this group is open to onboarding and working with Frag, Vihn and if appropriate Superman.
Seeing as Frag and Vihn have decided to try and remain with previous task force we can only hope they come around and issue a spend prop in the future to on board and work together. That would be ideal and this group sounds open to that idea.
It is HIGHLY disappointing that they prefered to stay with Tgf which is on shakey legal ground (confirmed by Cayman Islands prop), signed off a prop with missing/wanted member Superman (Do Kwon associated), NO NAMED LEAD DEV and a discredited and un-necessary LUNC âBurnâ Army (who supported Zaradar being anti Burn Tax).
Rabbis prop is the most LEAN and bare to the bone from all of the props. I only regret not having 2 previous L1 Devs, but it seems it is their choice to refrain from participating. In this case, we should choose this new team and cut any ties LUNC has with Do Kwon and compromised Ed Kims TGF and grift actor Zaradar. We must prove beyond doubt to the IRS and SEC that LUNC is no longer Do Kwons asset.
I think youâre confusing our L1 team with some other group or organization.
Yes, it does. Or if the community wants to be lenient, we could request they finish their Q1 roadmap without billing us further, before submitting newer spending proposals for Q2 (like theyâve done twice now).
Thatâs beyond the scope of this proposal and L1 work. I think the multisig prop by Vegas is still up on the Agora here, you may want to post the question there.
Of course, I am going to vote yes. I want a team focused on making me rich. What do the others offer? Novice devs, bureaucracy, and delays through a grifting project manager, and more grifting. Haha, itâs laughable. Frankly, anyone who doesnât support an alternative and structured plan for that is just plain mentally challenged.
I love that the scope of work is quite detailed and the work experience posts from the devs are a nice touch. Looks like a pretty talented crew. Great work on the revision, voting YES.
one of the ways TGF is compromised is that they are a non-profit but misused the money and acted like a for-profit organization, they havenât returned the remaining Q1 money back to the pool. the balance sheets just donât add up!
However. If someone said in last summer that we would be do (and spend main funds from CP) only on maintenance of network, instead of developing (returning applications) and repeg actions, I think 99% sold still in September. We have 1.5-2 years.
Agreed. Parity and chain maintenance is just the first step. We need growth, expansion, utility, a sensible USTC repeg, and upward scaling of development. LUNC is a startup with a $1B mcap - it should be treated as such.
Now that you mention it, itâs true that the deliverables for Q1 havenât all be completed, especially important keypoints like parity. And given the current situation of the L1TF team, especially with Zaradar and Ed gone, and Superman being, according to the rumors, âmissing in actionâ for 6 weeks, it is clear the work on the Q1 deliverables will not resumeâŚ
Maybe with a payment in Q2, which, in a way, is taking the upgrade hostage, if I may exagerate (a bit). I may be mistaken, and please anyone correct me if some public statements prove otherwise, but I saw no declaration showing an effort, or even the wish, to keep right on to the end of the development of the promised deliverables, or to refund a part of the budget to the CP.
The least that could be done given the situation would be to indeed return part of the initial budget, but the wallet doesnât hold it anymore, it has already been withdrawn, iirc.
Hell, even a corporate apology would be better than to say, or rather, pretend, that the Q1 has been completed successfully.
I would have to check the prop for myself later on, but it seem that nothing came out of it yet, and that may be for the better as these funds have been, in my opinion, irremediably tainted by their association with Do Kwon.
Of course I would be glad if these funds would be put to good use, but I fear that may involve trouble !
Thereâs over $30,000+ missing from there (in addition to the $10,000 unreturned listed there).
And they have the gall to ask for $125,000 in Q2 despite not finishing Q1. Superman is also an international fugitive (ex-TFL tied to Do Kwon), and TGF paid him despite knowing that. If all of that wasnât damning enough, TGF is also in violation of its 501C3 (non-profit status).
Iâm saying this objectively notwithstanding the fact that Rabbi has been condescending to many including myself, but credit where creditâs due, this is a much better proposal than the recently amended L1TaskForce proposal.
It is cheaper, has more developers, has better payment schedule to the benefit of the investors, and it does not ask for payment for placeholders or developers that have been MIA.
Jesus christ⌠This sums it all. In what scenerario does people think this is good?
-The same Terra scammers playbook of asking people to get paid while away/not doing anything at all (Superman, Tobias Andersen) ,
-plus Undisclosed âjunior devsâ (who probably never existed anyway)
-also who needs a âproject janitorâ getting paid $5k? NOBODY WANTS discord esque/Style mods. WE NEED MORE DEVS, CODERS, NO more âMANAGERSâ(another word for discord mods ) NO Shady orgs (TGF) .
TL:DR VOTING YES TO Rabbi's prop
LET'S GET LUNC TO 1 BEFORE THE BULL RUN LEAVE US Due to scam
props and twitter dramas
Your implication is wrong. When the agora and governance proposal went up, the value of the proposal was roughly $65,000. From the time the governance was approved along with the monthly distributions, the price has down hence why your $30,000 missing accusation is false, wrong, improper, inaccurate, shortsighted, unintelligible, etc., etc., etc⌠The focus is the USTC distribution amounts for each budget line. Those amounts are true and accurate. The remaining USTC is slated to be returned to the community pool at the end of this month. It should be valuated at around $10,000 but make sure you look at the price action as it can go up or down. If you need help with thisâŚlet me know.
