Joint L1 Task Force Q2 Proposal with Amendments

Governance & Proposals
266

True! There are not enough for everyone :stuck_out_tongue:
On that note, I will redelegate out of that validatorā€¦

267

Can I ask if devs were credited through a contractor management website for example UpWork?

268

Iā€™m late to the party here but quite frankly Iā€™m not interesting in giving (almost half?) of the money left to ANOTHER experimental team brought to you by L1JTF and the works. Iā€™m sick of people stroking their egos and taking away what little money we have left so they can pretend to be the ā€œgood guys.ā€ Enough is enough and we need something new altogether.

WE ARE HEADED FOR THE ROCKS PEOPLE! NO WITH VETO!

3 Likes
269

It means that the main name behind last Rabbi proposals went nuts

4 Likes
270

maybe it can be proof that a team is crazy :slight_smile: amaƧ belli. peki ya sonuƧ? Gƶreceğiz :joy: :man_facepalming:

271

Itā€™s also noteworthy THAT THIS PROPOSAL DOESNā€™T EVEN HAVE A SINGLE SENIOR DEVELOPER ON BOARD AND WE ARE JUST SUPPOSED TO TRUST THE INTERVIEW PROCESS OF PICKING THE NEXT LEAD (by presumably steve?) DEV BEST FOR THE INTERESTS OF THE COMMUNITY? WHAT A JOKE!

1 Like
272

I shows a bit why the JTF parted ways with them ā€¦

It shows they canā€™t be trustedā€¦

It shows the true faces of those that are in bed with Rabbi (they can afford you l, canā€™t they?!?)

Time always shows the truth!!!

Amem!

273

Sorry, but sometimes I doubt the intelligence of some people here. How can one be in favor of a proposal that is twice as expensive as the provided alternative and even offers a smaller team in addition? Furthermore, itā€™s not even clear who the senior developer will be. The L1 team also didnā€™t even complete all the work in the last quarter.

It only makes sense to give the new L1 team a chance.

  • Cheaper
  • Still more developers
5 Likes
274

dude i support the L1 team :slight_smile:

275

Cheaper doesnā€™t equal better.

277

proposal without an appropriate team to function is a NO from meā€¦
regardless - TY for putting this up.

3 Likes
280

Thatā€™s correct, but the performance of the current L1 team during the first quarter was not sufficient. Some tasks were not completed, and the money would have been retained regardless, had it not been for the intervention of some members from the LUNC community.

6 Likes
281

I would like to take dat position of the full-time developer, @RabbiJebediah @LuncBurnArmy @ek826, I will focus on USTC Revive workflow.

1 Like
282

As death approaches the animal lashes out more and more it grows desperate and tries to regain some vitality.
Just like we see @LuncBurnArmy try to return CP funds to appear as benevolent, but is useless as validators see right through his manipulations. Instead it should make peace that his grifting career at LUNC is over, just like the animal makes peace with death.

2 Likes
283

If all the work is complete to achieve parity why wouldnā€™t you support the L1 team. All I can see in here is a group of people trying to stop lunc from becoming a potential star. Stop playing your silly game, do something important for the community and support the team. I suppose another option would be to pay a head developer $300,000.00 the community cannot afford to try to reach parity. Why would you do that if the work is already complete. Vote yes and we have what was voted for through governance.

1 Like
284

EK left. Create prop.

285

What is going on? I havenā€™t been around for a whileā€¦ is he still with Rebel?

286

Prof. Edward Kim is working on his own project.
AI side chain. It is where his interests are for now.

1 Like
287

@LuncBurnArmy
Could you please review and let us know if you (members of L1) agree to the following Code-of-Conduct spending proposal rules:

  1. All spending proposals MUST be itemized
  2. Deliverables against all itemized components MUST be evidenced at the end of the spending proposal allotted period
  3. Surplus funds for the undelivered itemized components MUST be returned to the CP at the end of the spending proposal allotted period

P.S. This is a new initiative that hopefully will be expanded with other general rules that apply to ALL future spending proposals. I was considering adding one more which stipulated that funding would be delivered in installments but I suspect we need a chain contract to be written and handle this automatically in order to be fair for all parties. Not to mention the contract logic needs to be worked out and discussed with everyone beforehand.

2 Likes
288

i vote yes !!

2 Likes