I’m glad to see the proposal failing for the SECOND time (one time wasn’t enough for our beloved project manager). Please do not try and insult the community any further by getting it up for vote again. We do not want any more ‘moderators’ for 5K A MONTH. I voted NO WITH VETO!
Thats thors 9%. Allnodes didnt vote yet. They will have a pickle on it because of Jagmot being on TGF. When Legal issues start hitting TGF, its gonna end up biting them in the ass potentially too of anything fishy is found out. I doubt they would like to be in this position. Im not even gonna mention conflict of interest this puts them in. The issue about Allnodes having too much VP and controlling the keys of their rented nodes would surely come back to the spotlight again.
All these discussions and criticisms only retard the growth of the blockchain. Lots of people looking for something cheaper. Buying cheap can be expensive.
When I want something done in a short time and with good quality, I pay a generous amount and if I like the result I leave something extra.
What I suggest is going to this link and seeing the level of discussion these guys have. Have you seen this level of transparency from the likes of Zaradar? Paying for a top-tier service or equipment is often worth every penny, totally agree. However, in the case of this prop i feel like ending up in a tourist trap and getting robbed blind… i think this is more of a fitting comparison. This prop has literally 2 developers and a project manager.
Yes. That’s a positive, but I am more baffled on how Community has flip flopped around on the code of conduct/demands for doxxing/having hissy fits about detailed budgets (who got paid what?) and this prop passing proves that none of it matters.
There are 3 unknown players listed. Lead dev and 2 juniors. They can be literally anyone, whomever is available - even a Discord mod or a roomba. and that is fine, as long as the work is done.
Plus the list also has two players listed who aren’t available by the time this proposal ends.
(Jacob left the chain entirely alongside with Notional validator and InonMan is MIA)
I’m glad that we can sort of start moving towards L1 development work again, but this powerplay by both LBA and Rabbi isn’t sustainable and neither is having 10 different standards per proposal.
That is the exact reason why I was asking from @LuncBurnArmy a commitment to the Code of Conduct rules, so that funds will be returned back due to Rule 3 at the ends of the project should they be unused!
@LuncBurnArmy, @fragwuerdig Could you please provide an official answer on behalf of your team about whether you agree or not to the following spending proposal CoC rules?
as i already wrote with his pushy and unmature atitude, his proposals will never pass…ever. Somehow i have a feeling that his profile was hijacked or sold to bad player for what he become.
It’s less about reigning over the chain and more about fixing the damn thing and getting us to $1+.
I stand by everything I said in that screencap you posted: what’s going to happen now is the L1 “team” will deliver parity and then they’ll go into “maintenance mode”. Steve and Vinh are on record about this - they have no intention of growing the chain.
The months will go by and the price of LUNC will inevitably bleed as more and more holders sell and move on to other projects and investments. But this doesn’t matter to TGF/Steve/Marco because they’ll be draining fat paychecks for doing nothing. AllNodes too - they get $30,000+ per month for being the first validator (which is a shame, the Oracle reward pool curve should be ironed out, it’s far too steep in favor of top validators).
The end result is LUNC bleeding to death just so a handful of entrenched parties (TGF, AllNodes) can milk the chain for all it’s worth. Our collective investments are about to depreciate, gradually but irrevocably.
You haven’t “won” against Rabbi - you’ve lost to Allnodes & TGF.
LUNC will most probably add 1-2 more zeroes in the coming months. And I’ll buy all your bags for pennies on the dollar. If anything, this will give people like me (those who see what’s going on) an opportunity to become mega-whales at the expense of retail like you.
Jesus Lord! Check your facts a little further. He ain’t Alex!
He tried to silence and banish Alex from the community after the multisig discussion. In fact, Alex never wanted control of the chain, his words were flipped by the same avatar that is twisting facts and numbers now. And the bottom line was the same: wages. If that discussion went further, we could’ve been in control of the multisig assets for a long time now. Instead, it turned into a “lets throw it all into the CP.
Rabbi doesn’t want high qualified and skilled personnel working to revitalize this chain. Rabbi is no developer. Rabbi is just a post-crash holder eager to multiply his bags.
What are yoy laughing about exactly? That allnodes can sway any vote? Or that its obvious they voted Yes since Jagmot is on the TGF! Thats exactly an outcome @fragwuerdig was trying to avoid I believe.
This proposal may pass only because allnodes coveir their asses. 100% only reason this has any chances to pass