[Proposal] BURN and REMEDY fee with each LUNA transaction 💊 [PART I]

[SaveTerra]

What happened to our NO VITH VETO votes

[TerraLunaPhoenix]

13 validators said yes to the burn and more are among the most important with higher percentages…

[Trader_J]

Terra eventually proceeds with the vote But why isn't it reflected in the rejection?

We know how stupid and wrong this proposal is But a ridiculous sign of consent has already come out It’s weird I signed a disclaimer However, my opinion does not reflect The transaction became apparent This is to see if there’s a problem with the results of the vote Whether it’s late to reflect I think there’s a fabrication

https://finder.terra.money/mainnet/tx/CFF3704AF371C2D9993F9F1F94543D79FDE56F128DF761F72814A13A4CDD0E06

[Joe_Smith]

Bump ^^ for people not reading the thread:

[Proposal] BURN and REMEDY fee with each LUNA transaction [PART I]

Voting is for us is offline! You can test it yourself. Here is an example of a NO vote made yesterday: May 15, 2022, 5:43:18 PM (EDT) https://finder.terra.money/mainnet/tx/13BB267137A24E3C4A5F88ACA53944ADE4A8DA1759E3367D8CBDD5D36C500386 You are wasting your LUNA; however, this can be part of the official public record for when the courts get to it. [vote-test]

[MagicalTux]

decentralized voting in progress…

[Jishnu_saini]

Terra Station

Whitelist it again

[K123]

not fair

[Khaleesi]

@bloodcurdle are you still spearheading this initiative? I’m happy to help as well. Thanks for putting together this original proposal @HelloThere

[abc1]

I told you few hours earlier that it was decided, and everyone would vote for fork as soon as released. Didn’t I? Again, stop being delusional, it’s done

[dragneellarcade]

It’s not fair that this proposal got removed from the whitelist.
It has the support of several validators, it is not a junk proposal.
Whitelist it again, please.

[Vika-yes2burn]

It’s normal, it’s cex with DK leader lol, whats this blockchain… decentralised?

[AtoZ]

I am working towards whitelisting it again.

If you want my honest opinion, this proposal will never work.
The volume shared is the volume happening on CEX, where no fee can be added

If a fee is added, it would be only for on-chain transactions.

Also, as stated many times here, you can implement the burning mechanism on Luna Classic even with a new chain.

[Khaleesi]

Even with fork, there’s no reason Luna Classic can’t be burned.

[Jishnu_saini]

Please hurry people visiting to vote cant even see there are other proposals

[Gax16101]

Decentralized dictatorship.

Proposal 1273 is not whitelisted anymore

[TerraLunaPhoenix]

Now it’s 14 validators who said yes to the burn …

[NeoKobe]

14 validators says Yes !

[PaulB]

Maybe a team can be formed in order to contact the validators to present this proposal.

[Khaleesi]

This post explains how it would work for on chain transactions.

[Proposal] BURN and REMEDY fee with each LUNA transaction [PART I]

I would like to propose a very simple and immediately implementable mechanism for the burn. I have seen several major critiques of the current proposal. 1. It requires CEX support to tax buy/sells, no one wants that. 2. This would decrease trading volume. 3. Good idea, but who is going to implement this? Devs need to change the code. 4. Increasing gas fees would only only affect on-chain volume and it is too low. Here is my simplified/practical implementation of the burn that hopefully ad…

[dragneellarcade]

Despite this, the validators are voting for it. Put it back on the list, it is not right that this proposal is removed from visibility and it is necessary to contact each validator individually to get it noticed.