You were the one suggested to mint unlimited amount of Luna, go nail yourself on the cross!!!
There are bloods on your hands!!!
You were the one suggested to mint unlimited amount of Luna, go nail yourself on the cross!!!
There are bloods on your hands!!!
Look at the others coins that made it back.
I dont trust this GS390, he failed everyone and I wont let him bring us to hell again!!!
A fork is a must, nobody has enough money to buy back and burn trillion tokens.
The key question is when is the right time to take the snapshot.
The correct answer, not the last $1 tik, would be when you guys pull the trigger, i.e. increasing minting capacity.
lebrian9889](Profile - lebrian9889 - Terra Research Forum)
Just Join 1 day ago and you want to vote yes? How do we know you are not the new proxy of GS390???
I vote “No” with my 2 hands and 2 legs
Directly update the wallet on the chain and send the money they owe to the user every month. This is the most direct solution.
DO Not Fork Luna, its a VERY VERY bad idea
DO NOT F#$&ING FORK it, No one will trust you if you did mark my words.
You have been TOLD!
Anyone remember the Nickel event a couple months back with London Metal Exchange
All contracts with extraordinary prices were cancelled.
Not just blockchain, in real-life exchange, people cancel trades.
Before you speak again, can you go figure out how to clean up the blood on your hand?
I dont trust you and everything you suggest, I will vote “No” !!!
this is complete bullshit. This is a system that rewards attackers again. gs390 who are you, you’re new here and you just opened on your twitter account. Rewarding attackers no matter what the old network will no longer work is unacceptable.create a new blockchain and swap ratio old to new. ust/luna >>> ust2/luna The old network is now rip. You cannot safe. Taking snapshots at this suggestion is silly. You reward attacker them over and over again. The Resurrection Plan plan should cover everyone, not pre-attack.
I think it would more fair to think of a refund based on users’ amount of the refund, especially for UST. Small amount get a whole refund, between x, y amount get z, etc.
This will make a lot of people happier and establish in/outside trust and provide a better perspective of the Terra Ecosystem.
@gs390?
Another person who just joined for 1 day, how many proxy accounts this GS390 created???
There is no need to discredit people without discussing facts.
With the recent unfortunate event, this forum is getting a lot of attention.
Please stay on the facts and reasons.
Emotions are understandable, but may not be of help to solve the situations.
I don’t agree with you at all.
I think your first proposal, is what got us to where we are now.
I have been a quiet investor.
The de-peg got me alarmed, and started the proposal.
@dokwon supports the proposal [[here](https://twitter.com/stablekwon/status/1524331183261163520]
With regard to the sequence of events, you can find charts and data here.
UST is lehman - let this go - the VC’s will want to focus on where the value recovery is not where everyone knew that an ‘algo stablecoin that was backed by nothing’ UST holders were taking a full on equity risk and hold the bag - focus on luna and the community to recover
Right, Kwon and LUNA team should have halted the chain asap instead of increasing minting capacity. That’s the big question from me until now.
They did not do either…
You are probably right.
Anyhow, just trying to help.
Hope the Terra community recover from this unfortunate event…
I am sorry for all the losses people have suffered ( Including myself) - notwithstanding everyone in UST knew it was backed by air- and TBH it looks like an accelerated debasing of fiat that is so fractionalized and unsupported it should serve as a good example of failure and the right to move onto value recovery - burn and buy luna