Moeng
May 19, 2022, 5:36pm
277
2 Likes
Looks that way as well -_- Looking forward to your tweet about your findings!
Again, extending my gratitude for all the time and energy you’ve invested into keeping us in the know via twitter @FatMan !!!
as far as I know the fatman is preparing a class action
1 Like
alagiz
May 19, 2022, 6:59pm
281
got a feedback, there was a bit less in the community pool than the proposal tried to withdraw
Thanks for tagging me!
So this proposal passed and was executed. But it failed during the execution…
The parameter was to burn 1017233195000000 uusd but the actual number of uusd in the pool is 1006733195546782 uusd.
Sadly, the number changed between the proposal creation and its execution date.
The number was correct when the proposal was created .
The difference seems to be because of the proposal #1157 ( UST Goes Interchain: Polygon Edition) . It withdrew 10500000000000 uusd from the comm…
3 Likes
But it will be executed with fixxed parameters ?
chonka
May 19, 2022, 7:07pm
283
Considering it was a parameter issue, and the wording of the proposal that passed did state ‘remaining funds’ it would be logical… but who knows?
1 Like
Its very unprofessional to not execute this…
But indeed…who knows now
1 Like
Poop
May 19, 2022, 7:17pm
285
You literally just have to wait for them to reply
clearly things are in motion
jesus
2 Likes
Moeng
May 19, 2022, 7:23pm
286
I can feel your frustration lol easy on yourself buddy … people are tensed
sbuck
May 19, 2022, 7:24pm
287
Thanks for tagging me!
So this proposal passed and was executed. But it failed during the execution…
The parameter was to burn 1017233195000000 uusd
but the actual number of uusd
in the pool is 1006733195546782 uusd
.
Sadly, the number changed between the proposal creation and its execution date.
The number was correct when the proposal was created .
The difference seems to be because of the proposal #1157 ( UST Goes Interchain: Polygon Edition) . It withdrew 10500000000000 uusd
from the community pool.
The proposal’s status can be found on the blockchain . Same for the size of the community pool .
Terra Station hasn’t been programmed to display proposals that passed but failed to execute (never happened before). This is why the display looks like that.
A patch is in progress to fix Terra Station display.
Uh no? Things are not clearly in motion. They just said they’d fix the display so show that it passed but failed to execute. Not that they would fix the parameters and re-execute.
2 Likes
Poop
May 19, 2022, 7:36pm
290
ok its updated to show error in execution
Terra Station
thanks moeng
2 Likes
So what now? Does this go ahead seeing as it passed?
1 Like
Poop
May 19, 2022, 7:52pm
293
we wait for them to execute it properly and announce it
3 Likes
AtoZ
May 19, 2022, 8:05pm
295
The fund cannot be moved manually. No one has direct access to the community pool wallet.
A new proposal has been made with the actual amount.
2 Likes