What joke?
Everything was clearly explained and is verifiable on the blockchain (and has always been).
4 Likes
Cool, that’s a satisfactory response and it alleviates my concerns, thank you very much
5 Likes
has to be automatic upon voting pass?
that will take 7 more days?
When the number changes inevitably, it will fail again? Neat.
It will be automatically executed once the vote passes and the voting period ends.
Yes, there is no way to change that. This is the duration needed for “Community Pool spending” proposal.
1 Like
I don’t believe there is any other “Community Pool spending” proposals currently active that are likely to pass.
2 Likes
To extend this another 7 days is crazy though. I realize it’s not extending the previous prop, but creating a new one. If anyone realized that was the case, a new prop would have been created sooner.
Not to mention… if the amount to spend exceeded the available amount, it should have just used the available amount. Poor code which caused a failed execution.
6 Likes
Unreal
1 Like
@Poop - do we really need a new proposal to be voted on (which could also fail) to have the intent of the original proposal executed? Or is it a wait for a formal response from the devs? You have been very helpful and keen to get your thoughts.
Yes, there is no other way around it.
Please see [Proposal] Burn The Remaining UST in the Community Pool + Cross-Chain Liquidity Incentive UST 2
3 Likes
It’s taken over 12 hours to come to this conclusion?
Leave that self-proclaimed genius alone, he thinks he’s smarter than everyone else and tries to troll everyone, with pretty pathetic and ridiculous results
Not that there was much to be expected, looking at the profile picture is enough
Wouldn’t that proposal end date just be the May 27th date to set all of DKwonnects schemes in motion?
Karma…man ultimate karma is coming for what has happened with this project
Conspiracy theorists will always find something that makes sense for them.
- Someone is d e a d → People will believe it is a fake death
- Family confirms the death → People will say they are hiding something
- They do a DNA test on the body → People will say the doctor who made the test is paid
- etc… etc.
1 Like
Create the same proposal so they can’t delete it.
Considering that Luna Classic will continue to exist after the fork, then we will be able to burn Luna Classic after the fork.
Fork creation does not prevent Luna Classic from burning.
1 Like
The new proposal has already been created. See: https://classic-agora.terra.money/t/proposal-burn-the-remaining-ust-in-the-community-pool-cross-chain-liquidity-incentive-ust-2
Considering that Luna Classic will continue to exist after the fork, then we will be able to burn Luna Classic after the fork.
And yes, creating a new chain doesn’t mean Luna Classic cannot be burned.
3 Likes
I believe it is an issue of trust and until that is restored… perceptions will unlikely change
You seem to be the only one that can speak to things with some degree of knowledge in here. Do you know what will happen with WLUNA in the case of a new chain? Would it continue to follow LUNC (as it points to that contract) or LUNA as it’s currently designed to do?
3 Likes