No with Veto. 
4 Likes
I would have liked to see some reference to implementing a considerable burn rate…
Burns no longer make any sense and dont affect the price. We still not restored the applications, we still not working with repeg, its main problem.
But you can send your lunc to terra1sk06e3dyexuq4shw77y3dsv480xv42mq73anxu (burn address).
2 Likes
Burns do not affect the price?
A lot of people here write that they would like to see Lunc for $1+. But that would mean the price of the blockchain would be $7 trillion. This is more than 5 times the US budget for 2023. This is first. Secondly, there are simply no stablecoins for this amount yet. Thirdly, not only stablecoins, but the whole cryptocurrency in general.
Guys, do you really think burnings are unimportant?
1 Like
The hype is gone. Open charts. After the Binance burns, we only fall.
ONLY working apps can burn real volumes.
Big investors were waiting for restore of apps, repeg actions, end of distribution. But the team only plundered our CP for maintenance. All result you can see on charts.
If you are against any update, I don’t know what you are doing here. Since Lunc must upgrade to be on par with other networks and improve the economy between blockchains.
Another one who expects everything to be free or magically done.
it is confirmed this is a bait and switch to bring Tobias (Zaradar) back. The community spoke and this jokes on the L1TF are not listening.
5 Likes
Of course not.
Another one who expects maintrance to add any utility or price affect. Slowly d y i n g. Slowly l o o t i n g.
Hi Guys, just to let you know, I just asked @LuncBurnArmy and he confirmed there is no amendment, they’re still planning to hire Zaradar as the lead developer for 13,000$ / month.
They simply did not put it explicitly in this version to avoid any push back.
- Make a governance proposal
- Gets rejected massively by the community
- Make the SAME PROPOSAL asking for the SAME MONEY but OMITTING THE POINT OF CONTENTION to ensure it passes this time.
@LuncBurnArmy YES we are stupid BUT NOT THAT STUPID.
Also you seem to forget that trust is an asset.
@fragwuerdig and Vin you need to step up and side with the community. Not with these greedy people trying to secure themselves a permanent role at our expense.
13 Likes
So they lied?
And we’re meant to give them HOW MUCH of the community’s money?
7 Likes
It looks like I wasn’t paranoid after all ! After all his twitter drama, after all the condescending tweets about the community and all the ego-trip, there is now talk about making Zaradar come back on dev work in the L1TF for this prop.
I had my suspicions about this prop, but it could still be something good, although I do NOT want the community to pay for vacant seats and devs not yet disclosed.
But with the talks about bringing Tobias back, it’s NO WITH VETO ! He cannot allowed to come back after all the drama his attitude has caused, and his reaction (and disdain !) to the community.
There is now even rumours about some parts of the Q1 work that are going to be charged AGAIN on Q2 !
This proposal has it all :
-
They want to bring back Zaradar who has been very disrespectful to the community and was supposed to have moved on
-
One developer is supposedly missing in action for WEEKS and we have only some "just trust me bro’s about his current situation (and no word from Superman himself !)
-
Undisclosed junior developers (just like Q1, who were they ? If you do not provide their names right name, do not bother !)
-
We still have nothing to prevent bad behaviour from the team on social medias
-
The proposal went up to vote a mere HOURS after this second version came out !
-
The project manager is again getting a very generous rate, for a team that has not been completed yet !
-
A ton of still unanswered questions on the Agora and concerns on the Agora, of course, since this 2nd version was never opened to discussion to begin with, given how quick it was put to a vote !
-
And last but not least, a ton of those dreaded “1-liner” YAAAAAAS responses minutes after the proposal was posted. Most of them being accounts created just before !
Looks like some people have learned nothing from the recent Terraport disaster, we CAN’T proceed on such shaky grounds for Q2, heck, it’s not even shaky at this point. This is malicious, full stop !!
10 Likes
This is insane. Zaradar has been a blight on the chain and it is clear that the community does not want him working on LUNC. It is baffling why anyone is supporting LBA and this prop when they’re using such underhanded methods. If the community can’t curb its celebrity worship and look at things objectively we are going nowhere.
10 Likes
this is freaking nuts!! they think we really are that stupid!!!
I am tired of these mental gymnastic word salads they think they can trick us with.
also
thank you for showing me this, it’s no wonder why Steve is doing EVERYTHING TO RUSH out the vote, they don’t want to give up the $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ and just keep bamboozling the community!!!
I AM SICK OF THIS!
8 Likes
Total disrespect for governance, prop put up 1 day after voting, bringing back Tobias, fluffed up budget, absent devs, double charging.
There is more red flags in this prop than atoms in the universe.
Community should be VOCAL in it’s opposition to this BLATANT CASH GRAB. No with veto.
9 Likes
What are you talking about? That’s not Zaradar - that’s Tobor from Bulgaria! 
It’s not the community that’s doing this, it’s the Terra Grift Foundation, Steve, Marco, Ed, Tobias, and their media shills like MrDiamondHandz… they’re gonna use corrupt validators on their side to push this through. They’re acting like the LUNC chain is their own personal property, and the rest of us – people who’ve invested our money into this blockchain! – can just piss off if we don’t agree.
It’s tyranny.
6 Likes
The FUD patrol is on full speed mode lately. Since the voting is not going their way, they pressed the throttle even deeper. The initial problem was the raise in budget. now that the budget was revised, the open spots are the issue. Even if names were thrown there, there would be issues raised by Rabbi and co. It just don’t stop.
Bilbo must need that senior position wages really bad.
2 Likes
exactly the same as before.
Actually he will get 12.5K$ instead of 13K$ So an amendment of 500$ per month. Please see below.
$37.50k = $12.5k (need replacement) x 3 months
Please keep in mind there is no way on earth the guy is worth twice that. Even that much I dont think so. People seems to be completely out of touch with the market rates.
I’ll try to share some job offers with salaries later on so you get an idea.
3 Likes
how is it FUD, when johny was pointing out that we are being LIED to, so you like being lied to? and the revised budget still has empty spots so who knows where the not so revised budget goes to, but you and co, just don’t give a f*ck.
LuncBurnArmy must really want to keep that overpriced project manager position really bad.
3 Likes
It’s no use arguing and trying to find a middle ground with a bunch of fanatics getting carried over by arguments based on false accusations and presumptions, made up by a group of moonboys that care more about personal attacks than the chain development.
It’s no use arguing with a community that blindly accepts an avatar (@RabbiJebediah) with no blockchain knowledge trying to lead a bunch of unknown developers in a totally unprofessional way.
At least we knew the faces of @ek826 @Zaradar @fragwuerdig
5 Likes