Big Yes! Thank you.
Yes let’s go
as always ed comes thru
Let’s do it as it sounds to help us in a big way!
Absolutely Yes.
Yes from me. Thanks to all and keep up the great work! ![]()
![]()
Let’s do it Ed! YES
Yes from me
Please can you provide some answers to the following points:
- Which testnet is being used to test these changes?
- Who is involved in the testing?
- Can you provide a link to the test plan you are working to and test results achieved so far?
- Is the testing simulating the effects of any trapped liquidity that is present in the classic mainnet closed IBC channels?
- Do you know the precise amounts of liquidity that is trapped in the closed IBC channels?
- What do you expect the effects to be once the IBC channels are opened and that trapped liquidity is released into classic mainnet?
Big Yes
Yes!!!
Oc Yes, let’s move forward.
Yes from Bali, Indonesia
Un voto Yes ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Sure here are the details
Testnet IBCs are running between grad-1 (osmosis testnet), rebel-2 (terra testnet), and rebel-3 (my local machine)
Prelim testing the code has been by Notional , integration testing is done by me; however code review sign off has been done is Notional, Osmosis, Terra Rebels, and Interchain
I don’t have a link, but here is what happened.
- (pass) Setup clients, connections, and channels between the three testnets
- (pass) Transfer lunc to osmo, and vice versa via IBCs
- (pass) Close the channel via code on the lunc side (channel.State = ibcchanneltypes.CLOSED)
- (pass) Ensure no chain halt required
- (pass) Ensure that the app SetChannel state is now closed via LCD
- (pass) Ensure IBC transfer cannot happen via closed channel (ERROR the requested port/channel (‘transfer’/‘channel-0’) on chain id ‘rebel-3’ is in state ‘CLOSED’; expected ‘open’ state)
- (pass) Open the channel via code on the lunc side (channel.State = ibcchanneltypes.OPEN)
- (pass) Ensure no chain halt required
- (pass) Confirm that the app SetChannel state is now open via LCD
- (pass) Transfer lunc to osmo, and vice versa via IBCs
There are some other things I want to hammer out regarding what happens to a validator that doesn’t upgrade, and unfreezing of the tendermint clients, and i’ll report what happens with them once I do.
As for the liquidity trapped, it is heavily on the Osmosis side, 41B lunc 158M ustc. I think everywhere else is nearly negligible. I cannot speculate on what will happen once the IBCs are open. I assume there may be arbitrage (I think this is already normalizing); however, there are a number of additional steps that need to happen (like unfreezing clients on both sides, setting up relayers, etc) before anything can flow back and forth.
朋友你好 ![]()
Yes definitely, let’s start this glory train.
Thanks very much for the comprehensive reply @ek826, looks good to me!
Why did the lunc I pledged “cancel the entrustment” for no reason?What’s going on?Is this terra station still secure?
osmosis as in frontier osmosis? because they have moved lunc there