35 out of 84 have actually voted, the rest are ignorant. People must redelegate, why would those validators even be locked in if they don’t even participate in a community proposal!!!
Just orion.money have to vote and it will pass. Does somebody know what they are waiting for?
radio silence from Orion. not a good sign
They will vote YES …
Be patient.
Its been ~1,5 month, give it 6 months or so. Im not here to argue, it just not make sense to do it so early with all of these newcoiner (99,9%) coming in like they own the chain.
All I can see is wen burn lunc, wen this, wen that. They dont care about the old luna, they only thinking about wen lunc $1
6 months is too much - the oracle rewards won’t even last 2 years. It would probably take another 2 weeks to prepare the software and co-ordinate the re-launch, so the 0.01% would have received the rewards exclusively for 2 months at the very least (@ ~4647170% APR).
With resumed on-chain activity post enabling staking, dapps would also be incentivised to build.
Voting is not that powerful of the previous proposals, i am worried ![]()
There are legitimate concerns - give the validators time, I’m sure they will vote on what’s in the best interest of the network.
What is certain is that the community must take validator votes into account, never delegate its tokens to the validator who has not voted!!! we accept those who voted yes, no or abstention but not those who have shown no interest in the proposal
There is no such thing as “like they own” the chain. They literally DO own the chain.
If you buy 10 dollars worth of Tesla, then you are by legal definition the rightful stock owner of Tesla corporation. You should have the right to participate in any corporate event just like every other Tesla stock owners out there.
It doesn’t matter if you made the purchase when Elon Musk was near bankruptcy for the 12 times, or when he became the richest man in the world. You are the rightful owner, only thing can change is the value of that ownership due to various market conditions.
Now what these owners do or feel about the chain is nobody’s business. Would you like somebody telling you what to do with your money?
If you don’t like what the 99% “new coiners” did or might do to the chain. Then guess what, those coins should have never been sold to them on the open market. Now the only way to legally and ethically shut them down is to buy back all those coins.
支持你的说法,这是很关键的,提案顺利实施的话,再也不想自己的投票权被胁迫了!
My thanks to the validators who had the ballz to vote, you are showing you are true champions of the community. The list of validators who voted will not be forgotten when time comes to stake.
Most likely TFL will not implement the pull request, like they ignored the other proposals. So the hard part starts now : getting a code that has been tested enough to be accepted to be put into production by validators. That’s what terra rebels developers have been actively working on since several days. Hopefully efforts will pay off!
I just can’t confirm vote for 4095 proposal, the terra station site throws an error:
VOTE_OPTION_UNSPECIFIED: invalid vote option
Anyone had this issue?
99 % of holders still can not vote. This proposal will fix it after some time
The Terra blockchain is a proof-of-stake blockchain, powered by the Cosmos SDK and secured by a verification system called Tendermint consensus, changing this is as simple as creating a new project. so as you are smarter than all of us show us your skills and create a new ambitious project and we will come to you
The IBC channel has not yet reopened, although 2 proposals have been approved. I’ve been stuck for too long with no help, can anyone get it working or any suggestions at terraC
He is just super smart but never did something. You have to really love people like him. (Irony) just ignore and flag. Forum will get rid of him soon.
Usually, people like you are nailed to the strong …
@dfunk I can´t wait to ask you. What will be next step? I know there will be much job with pulling code and restarting the chain but what you suggest for next step after that?
