I hate to say I can’t disagree with you so long as TR remains silent on the specifics regarding these funds.
If money that was presented the community as being set aside for Rebel Station is being spent on “internal consultation,” “team management,” “administration” etc… I fear with makers like Zaradar or Ed Kim out of TR, takers are now calling the shots.
I hope I am wrong but only @TerraRebels can set the record straight.
Terra Monopoly.
This 100%. We had to break the ice at some point and now we know where we all stand. The truth is out, TR doesn’t have LUNC’s best interests at heart, and I would suspect - in their inaction over the past couple of months - they have caused a lot of the instability with our governance.
Excited by 2023 and divorcing ourselves from TR.
And in the meantime:
Do You see the difference?
My funds are staked with TerraCVita knowing they now look after Terra Station. Thanks guys!
This community is some kind of joke…giving 150k for unknown and probably unnecessary work in moment when we need much more to do real work to repeg, buyback etc…
This moment is like playing Terra Monopoly…
i’am sad about it…
I honestly do not understand what the fuss is over.
Seems to me when I have re-read everything that the only real issue gossip queens like LUNCDAO have is that some money went to a couple of community leaders…correct? But is that not covered by:
?
And prior to this recent mud-raking and gossiping the only real critique was that Rebel Station was not needed because Terra Station would provide wallet services.
In the real world backup systems and redundancy is a good thing. Also, there is a side of decentralization, sure not in the normal sense, but decentralized management and interface of funds.
Just not seeing the big issue that LUNCDAP gossip queen is pushing on Twitter.
LUNCDAO calls itself the guardian of LUNC but it seems no one from LUNCDAO does any kind of development work and they only seem to gossip. Correct me if I am wrong.
I never heard that discord mods could back up or provide Terra Classic infrastructure redundancy.
If this proposal was so bad why did LUNCDAO not even bother voting? Seems to me LUNCDAO is more concerned with their social media following then they are with LUNC itself.
He talked the talk but did not walk the walk ,
I am beginning to wonder if we should only let validators vote on technical related items like actual code changes to the blockchain and not allow them to vote on parameter changes (e.g., 1.2% vs. 2%) or business issues (e.g., funding a developer). Too few validators carry too much power and too many validators cannot even be bothered to vote abstain.
Now that we have a Layer 1 taskforce. Can TR confirm that they are disbandoning and will no longer ask this community for funding? I believe we all appreciate what you achieved for LUNC in the past but now would be a good time to endorse the new team and strengthen it’s back and confirm TR full support for the new team for the good of LUNC. You have enjoyed a fat Christmas hamper, now its time to pay up in form of not standing in the way of LUNC future.
What I heard last is that some people were sending the money back to the TR wallet - like Yogabba. He sent it back to the wallet. Now I don’t know what TR is doing. They have blocked me from everywhere or not responding to most people. I dunno who is talking to them currently. I did hear some influencers were in touch with them.
They need to come out with a statement. I don’t know what they are doing.
The other thing is that what are they even doing without Yogabba in the team? I thought he was the lead front end developer. So isn’t he supposed to be making the wallet? God knows.
The bottom line is:
We (the community) funded TR to do some work, I don’t care what each influencer man and his dog say. I’ll personally judge them by their deliverable and that’s that.
Would be nice to get regular progress updates here rather than on Twitter though. I hope all DEV teams understand that Agora is the community equivalent of a PARLIAMENT and should report to the community here first.
Proposals are raised for discussion here, then move to a voting stage and all actions need to be traced back in some type or form to the original discussion forum mentioned in the raised proposal so the process loop is closed and traceable.
Btw @TerraRebels wassup? How’s it going? 
To be fair - rarely do folks come here to look for UPDATES.
This is a forum thread. Endless scrolling and reading through loads of random comments just for a snippet of an update versus Twitter? Twitter wins.
Updating the OP endlessly has the same effect.
I mean, who in their right mind would come to Agora to write an update on a proposal that passed and thus this proposal thread has served it’s purpose. My first instinct certainly isn’t to find updates on this feed.
Proposals are raised for discussion here, then move to a voting stage and all actions need to be traced back in some type or form to the original discussion forum mentioned in the raised proposal so the process loop is closed and traceable.
A belief or an understanding by you, not a pre-requisite nor a requirement.
Only if you are paying attention and people start sharing it like crazy and you are in the known groups. Even then becomes history after 48 hours. The attention span of Twitter is smaller than a forum thread that has a start a body and an end.
You will find most proposals close their loop here before the crash. How can one tell that progress is being made if no semi-regular updates are provided?
It is Agora that is relevant to LUNC - twitter is not. This is where I come for updates, this is where the community documents its discussions, proposals, anything relevant. It should be a prerequisite and requirement to use Agora as it was created for the purpose, Social Media was not.
