Well, unless we are starting to see any of your good core plans in motion or presented in a way that can be utilized - it’s still just yapping.
So far, those rebels are the ones that have kept the chain alive-ish. Fixing the code for validators, re-enabled staking, doing all the actual work that you only speak about doing, but never get around to…
I would say DYOR, but does seem you intentionally ignore all the sources that would prove your presumptions ridiculous and wrong.
No worries, Koch, you can always rage in the forums as an afterthought. At least you have that.
Yapping is a requirement of organizational movement.
In this land of anonymity and scams it’s difficult to know who did what and lately the rebels have been requesting large amounts of Lunc from the pool ~ seems appropriate to question and get a bit upset when just a runaround and assumptions are provided… the rebels need to do more yapping.
If the rebels did flip the switches you claim they flipped ~ thanks rebels… now we have to do more than just flipping the switches back on… and, this Rebel Wallet seems unnecessary and expensive… We have a core that needs redesigning and coding.
I would like the Rebels to upgrade LUNC to work on the Interchain Station and I would like them rewarded handsomely for it. If it takes 6 months that is fine. What you do with your own Rebel Station and apps is your business you are self declared for profit from here on. This community should pay for upgrades not downgrades. Get us ready to work on Interchain Station or if you cannot do it we need to engage somebody else.
I think you still haven’t understood that this is not the station that is problematic, but access to LCD/FCD. Web access to station represents nothing, but LCDs much more.
After nothing prevents you from launching your local classic terrad knot and pointing your LCD on it
But hasn’t the TFL (through DK) already said they will support Lunc in the new system without the need for funding from us? So, the new system app should communicate with the necessary nodes… third-parties (like the rebels) will need to fix things in their apps, why should the community fund those fixes?
Hello again. I would like to repeat my question from yesterday - can TR upgrade Terra Classic to work on the new interchain wallet? Can this become part of this proposal? I know its costly and time consuming - but can you do it? Are you willing to do it if the community is willing to pay? The title of this thread is “Separation of Rebel Station from TFL infrastructure”
I am not in support of side lining LUNC from the development surely to come from TFL. It would be the end of our chain to separate LUNC from LUNA.
With the recent findings that TFL has not engaged in wrong doings like for example FTX likely has - this crew which brought lunc to success before is becoming more and more relevant again. Are we to cut ourselves off from success by taking a different path? Not what I would do.
Rebels, it is the time to step up and prove your value. Tell us how you will upgrade this chain to work on the new Interchain Station, keep us in the game, do not separate us for we are here to make money.
It appears as if the wallet issue is averted for the time being . Can we get the proposal for the v2.0.3 parity upgrade work sent o Ed Kim’s team? The community needs to pay the devs. Let’s not delay. Zarador is going on vacation. Let’s give him a Christmas present by paying him and the other devs. They deserve to be paid.
We will do it, my friend Preparating and Running your node, that’s what we’re talking about. Redesigned and modernized as the community wants it, not daddying TR representingwith a poor sheep, fudge - thank you to all intermediaries !
I and the community are supposed to control the AI - artificial intelligence
NOT - AI of you and me on request = MASK system Starling…
For our money! Stop machinations and manipulations for our coins!
For you photo from 2008 from Satoshi :
I think this is the best oportunity to finally find out who is worth of our trust.
In this case we have in one corner DK and his new wallet. And in the other corner TR with their wallet.
To find out who is lying and who is not all we have to do are the next steps.
Step one.
Vote NO to this proposal. (This is because if it passes there is not coming back to Lunc we will at our own with TR on command)
Step two.
Wait until december ends. This proposal explicit says by the end of this year Lunc holders will have problems. (If we dont wait until the clouds of the month are gone we wont know if TR are in our side)
Step three.
My dear community. The only rule which matters is the gold’s rule (who has the gold make all rules!!!). And it happens that our community pool is fill with almost 150 K of Lunc watta coincidence (There are not coincidences in life only syncronicities)
Finally if everything goes completely wrong which means the next
1 - DK hurt us (Again )
2 - TR leave us
3 - We get our coins trapped.
All we have to do is remember two things.
A - Gold’s rule
B - We are part of the sdk of cosmos top 5 most develop blockchain technologies.
So, dont u agree if we wait until end of the month, we still could use the community pool as a bounty for a team willing to please one next desires.
1 - Catch with Luna new technology.
2 - Have our own Lunc station (not Rebel Station) with the help of AllNodes, Osmosis, and some validators we could have components LCD/FCD working the way we need them not the way someone wants to sell them to us.
Perhaps spend more time in their Discord and communicate with them, instead of lurking on Agora posts.
Fact that you even have proposals to yap on endlessly, without any sort of constructive purpose is thanks to the team.
Absolutely. Anyone could do it. Yet as we see - not anyone has done it and as the year comes to an end - besides TR and ex-TR members - not much actual activity.
Everyone, including me, is an expert when it comes to critique, but actions are rarely the forte of such ilk.
And i’m not part of the order of Magi.
Not all forums are built the same, so umlaud wovel support in usernames is rare.
@Tonu_Magi and whoever else the following statement applies to:
~ Please, don’t think the Terra Rebels did (turn switched back on) something that only they alone could have done. Much appreciation should be given to them in our historic documents ~ it’s also now time to do what others cannot. Don’t get tied-down by the past!
Your plan is that of inaction. The one that benefits from inaction is DK because then he holds all the cards and can close us down trapping our coins forever once again!
TR is not the only developer group we can have but are the only developers (at present) willing to help us and actually are doing so in practice. The fact that we are able to stake, vote even discuss this proposal right now is thanks to the efforts of the TR developers.
Don’t forget DK froze the chain TR unfroze it, updated it, and gave it back to the community. If you want to bet your horse on the first that’s your call, I vote for moving forward and progress for our chain…
Has the community sought after any other coders? Or, has it just took what coders they had at the moment of crisis? It’s difficult to believe there are no other coders available… what seems to be the problem is the community hadn’t (and still have no plans to) pursued any other coders.
It’s time to do that work so we can get lower constructor costs (competition).
Preparating and Running your node, that’s what we’re talking about. Redesigned and modernized as the community wants it, not daddying TR representingwith a poor sheep, fudge - thank you to all intermediaries !
)