Well. We have to gain hundreds if not thousands of dapps and potentially users and volume and price appreciation or…We do nothing so current smart contracts do not need to do anything.
What do you want? Chain to progress or stay put?
If you want progress, go to luna2. Our chain named is Luna Classic
Cause it’s labeled “classic” it has to stay frozen in time and attached to outdated tech ?!?
1 Like
yes, the classic functionality should remain workable. If you want experiments - go to luna2 or do a fork.
1 Like
This line of thinking… makes me laugh, really
This is the most nonsensical reply that I’ve ever seen.
Do tell me - did you use a pigeon or a telegram to reply?
1 Like
Hi Everyone, just a quick note that we will be providing an update in the next few days that outlines in greater detail the approach for the wasm migration which will allow for existing smart contract holders to be able to utilize their contracts on-chain.
Our focus with the migration is to ensure that existing contracts and the data associated with them are maintained (there has been a lot of misinformation surrounding this), while also ensuring that any required updates to contracts by their owners are minimal in order to run on Cosmwasm v1.1.0.
Following that update and further discussion, the proposal will be put up for vote.
2 Likes
Gut_Daddy will be voting…YES on this
LuncBurnArmy:
Mirror community does not have the ability to change contracts because the owner is unknown.
To change owner (vote quorum) is needed 3.5 millions MIR ($178 000).
1 Like
Good idea.
Mirror community needs to start working on funding themselves.
We are not looking for funding. we’re just saying, don’t break our workflow
1 Like
Well, it’s either this chain sees any chance on future survival or not do anything so Mirror telegram community can stay as is?
One outweighs the other.
What is survival, if users leave the chain? Open the price chart, there is a falling trend. How do you expect to raise the price, with the mass departure of users. I have seen this in other chains with similar management.
After price drop the validators will start to leave. And then the delistings will start. The market does not react positively to your upgrades.
Hence the upgrades…?
Is it not obvious to everyone that this is the point of the upgrades to stop the bleeding and bring new interest to the chain.
If Mirror is affected due to it - adapt and progress. Staying stagnant only leads to lower lows and disappearing users.
How can be a new interest, if the old ecosystem is will be broken?
Only one metric of success is a price. And while it is not positive
Have you ever heard of this thing called BTC? A total poopcoin that one was.
Lost 90% of its value some 10 years back. What a silly token. And last year it had a total Mcap of a 1.5 trillion. Then it lost a trillion in value. Imagine that. Still has 45m users.
Terra had a mcap of 60b at it’s height and crashed when at 40b.
Yes. Back in '22 the chain crashed. Original owners abandoned it and now here we are - slowly reaching parity with rest of the Cosmos.
There already are dapps and other chains looking to expand here. There are dapps that are currently working here.
All these proposals are to the effect that the price shall appreciate greatly.
Of course, selectively ignore the current worlds economical situation. Banks going bankrupt. Major exchanges going under. Defaults here and there. Interest rates at 13 year high.
Im sure Mirror is pushing new highs every day, right?
1 Like
“There already are dapps and other chains looking to expand here.”
Name at least one DAO, who wants expand to lunc. What the hell are you talking about?)))
1 Like
One only?
E: Confirmed. Launch in ~2 weeks (pending parity availability on 31st of May)
You really have no idea whats happening on this chain, do you? Look farther than Mirror telegram.
1 Like
Proofs?