@RabbiJebediah ~ you’re a phisher of men… the detail required to justify your disbursement of community funds is lacking and after me asking twice for it, you keep directing me to your vague explanation… I just want to do my best to keep things honest and fair.
Here’s what I think you’re suffering from (besides incompetence):
@RabbiJebediah ~ you appear competent to the naive…
Shalom and I concur Rabbi
Thank you for the warm welcome. It is a scary world out there. I hope you and your family remain safe.
The author of 10940 should be ashamed of himself for including the hateful banning of Alex Forshaw in the proposal. I don’t often agree with Alex views but he is entitled to his opinion and I would never ban him from the community. I will be using my 90 million LUNC to vote no with veto.
Over $1.2M to go directly to Terra Rebels, why? They have not done a lot of work so far. Money should be paid for work completed, funds should be allocated on a per task basis, and voted on by the community. The amount paid should be based on the complexity and therefore amount of work involved, then on completion of the work, or at various checkpoints along the development process, funds should be paid out.
$400,000 finders fee, are you joking, $40,000 finders fee is probably still too much. Again, how much work has been put in by Alex on this?
@RabbiJebediah ~ you also appear competent to those who could profit $ off your phishing expeditions…
Voting no.
Simply being well articulated means nothing in trying to cover up ill intent.
I have already redelegated part of the tokens that were in validators in favor of silly proposals, to obtain the money from the multisign or that are not in favor of decentralization. They have been losing power.
But I think they are going to force me to sell everything and go to Luna 2
I hope we can oust the scammers, it’s a shame the community is torn by them… If they win and drain our funds ~ I’ll be pulling out of here and going to my other home on the Elrond network.
How is he “banned”? Banning implies permanently excluding someone.
Mr. Forshaw can take the money and still contribute anonymously. Or he can refuse the money and continue contributing under his real name. The decision is 100% his, the power rests with him. The anti-participation clause is more of a severance payout than anything else.
Please learn the meaning of words and terms before abusing them to fit your narrative!
Shalom! 
You, the fake identity posing as a Rabbi unwilling to disclose who you are but willing to risk the future of LUNC to suit your own greed. Not just by pretending to stand for something but particpating in this heist and undermining the legitimately passed proposal 10936 - Terra Station by hiding it and making it appear as if it did not exist making sure it gets no further votes? Not that it needs any more votes, it already passed making this proposal right here obsolete.
Can you explain to me who is hiding this proposal to make it look like yours has any legitimacy?
Must be a very short lists of people who can manipulate terra station? Any thought on just how much legitimacy is being lost right now? Any consideration that your greed is likely the end of LUNC?
Are you willing to go all the way? Because we will identify you and you will enjoy the legal consequences if this heist goes through.
What does the end of Lunc matter to @RabbiJebediah if the ‘rabbi’ has his cut of the stolen funds? Clearly, the ‘rabbi’ sees no future for Lunc ~ so, whoever the rabbi is will make money however possible. People who have nothing to offer have to steal, that’s the only way they get ahead in this reality… and the ‘rabbi’ is working at getting ahead.
I’m not getting any of that money so you accusing me of profiting from it is not just slander but also false.
Try and come up with some better accusations in the future, your current ones are worn out.
Shalom!
Pointing out a 4 million heist in progress does not get old.
And you are not answering the question. How do you feel about proposal 10936 being hidden from the public to favour this one? Clearly a proposal already passed which invalidates this one. And somebody is hiding it. How do you view it that insiders are obviously manipulating this process? Since you have no financial interest in this - you don’t think the whole thing should be stopped from happening? You have no interest in stopping the undermining in the confidence of this community? I said it before - you are everything this community never needed. If this passes I will use my resources to bring the involved to their deserved justice. Burn this wallet now! its the only sane way out at this stage.
No one is hiding any proposals, there’s a bug on Terra Station and it’s pushing props off page 2.
Y’all need to chill out and unwind; not everything is a conspiracy.
Shalom! "
yeah… the bug which only affects that one proposal those fixing bugs don’t like. Does not affect the proposal which came before nor the one after. No, not everything is a conspiracy but this is just so blatant. And if we assume it is a bug - still the same outcome, it invalidates your proposal for your competing proposal is experiencing a “bug”. If it is that way, in the name of fairness, stop these proceedings they are then obviously tainted and you would not want to cheat?
And what do you mean pushing props off page 2? This was on page 1 until it was disappeared. Right next to yours. Plenty of room for more. And we both know the whitelisting process is manual. So if there was a bug - it could still be whitelisted to be seen. This fairylale comes with a prison sentence.
I cannot see it in your screenshot, I believe you are looking a different one. To be sure - The hidden proposal is proposal ID 10936
This now hidden proposal was whitelisted some time ago, it has gathered enough votes to pass and has been hidden for the past 24 hours plus.
You can only find it if you remember the link. It’s intent fully contradicts this distribution proposal defining these funds to be sent to the community pool. It will pass although hidden. Will the result be hidden too?
