It appears new holders since the de-peg cannot vote on terra station so let’s just see how people feel here. Doesn’t necessarily mean this exact plan just burning vs forking.
It makes no sense, dontkwon already made a decision by himself.
Because they want to fuk off UST holders. They absolutely don’t care about community.
This is how their ‘community-owned’ chain works and will work in new fork.
I’m all for the burn method, but how do you propose making this happen? Massive Luna was minted; however, its also all sold is it not? One of Do’s Twitter posts seemed to relate to this specific subject matter, as it seems to allude to being stuck between a rock and a hard place. Multiple completing interests: UST holders want to be made whole. Luna holders want to be made whole. Investors, developers… It would seem that in any scenario one or more interests get the stick. I don’t much like the fork idea; however, i have a feeling that its the lesser of all evils. That and… does it not encourage folks to purchase existing UST/Luna pre launch? Could those very actions make the fork solution unnecessary?
I support the burning and here is my suggestions about speed up the burning
All it takes is to attract a large number of current luna owners to bid for the NFT, and Luna can be burning in a short period of time,Without incurring too much external cost
and these features are not complicated and should be developed quickly,
by the way,if you think this is a good ideal, please retweet it and let community developers to see it,or let Do Kwon or CZ see it(my twitter was blocked),or Initiate a vote if you can,thanks
I think both burn and Fork will happen. On 27th airdrop/FORK will happen. Post airdrop, burn can be implemented in Luna classic. if you see eth-eth classic ratio, Luna classic will reach 10 cents in a couple of months.