Some people buy from $60 after “Pre-attack” and some buys 0.000001.
Please split based on zero (like 7 part) this %10 category.
If someone buys from 0.000001 they must get %15 of %10 i think.
2 Likes
Dude everyone had the possibilities to buy at the bottom. So what you are saying is also unfair because you dont even know how much they invested at 0.00001. Maybe it was only 50$ because they thought why not… but I dont believe people put there more then 500$ or sth because everyone had the fear to lose everything again… so stop argue about this bullshit. You can still buy for low at the moment too.
Marketcap mate. Invest $50000 early days becomes $50 at the bottom that’s the argument.
If you are going with Fork then do it in a proper manner!
Whoever bought during 8 to 12 th may supply was 400M to 5B max.
People bought it because of your tweets!
Now make everyone equal and distribute according to the supply at that price point.
If someone bought at 40$ and supply was 400M then they should be getting accorindg to that circulations.
Now people are competing against 6.9T supplies!
Where most of us bought when there was much less circulation in the market!
Please do not say everyone has chance to buy now as people don’t have much as you.
I myself bought during 8 to 12 thinking it is the bottom as do kwon tweeted he had recovery plan.
And first proposal seem to cover us, but the final proposal seems we were left out.
Everyone getting somthing but people bought during 8 to 12 are not getting anything at all
4 Likes
you were happy to buy the coin at 50$… so it’s the same. Buy more now, DCA newbie.
1 LUNA = 1 LUNA!
You’re the biggest vulture and liar I’ve ever seen 
Go to Binance or others exchanges and see their order books, millions and billions bought everyday
hello guys i want to know about a topic please can anyone help me? e.g; Let’s say 4 million luna$ were bought at a low price after the attack, how to calculate 10% of this and how many luna$ will be in my bag in the new system
I totally agree with that, how many people knew there would be 6.5 TRILLIONS coins when the coin started to dip? No info anywhere, no warning on exchanges . Only way after, when price was considerably lower people knew and exchanges displayed warnings. There should be a proportional compensation if you bought at $15, $1 or $0.0000001.
It only makes sense. Maybe people invested a lot at the bottom like I read here, fine for them but they invested on a basis of a much larger supply. The reward (if there is one) should be proportional to the relative supply at the buying time, otherwise it makes no sense.
3 Likes
The tweet also said that UST is out of 1 dollar, don’t care, I have said it many times~ Now what?
What about people who bought after 7TH may.
People who bought solely based on your tweets you kicked them out.
You seem to cover us in the first proposal then you are completely ignoring now.
All the people are equal. You are covering the people who bought before 7th May and after 13 may when circulation jumped to trillions.
But what about the people who bought during 8 to 12 may price was still high and supply was 400M to 10 B at max.
You are compensating the people (i am mot against it) who sold that’s why people bought 8 to 12 may because they sold and they are compensating still
And people who bought at 0.1 to 70$ literraly getting nothing because they bought during 8 to 12 may.
IF you want to make it fair then don’t give everyone everything or do it in a fair manner.
Why it’s hard to understand there are three type of groups.
People who bought before the attack
People who bought during the attack (before the last halt)
People who bought and buying after the last halt resume.
So distribute in a fair manner.
You either do snapshot before the last halt.
Or maybe there should be three snapshot.
On 7th May as proposed.
On 12/13Th May (before the halt)
On 27th May as you proposed.
Everyone would be equal in that sense.
Because most of us who bought during 8 to 12 may literally getting nothing
Or fairly distribute people according to the circulation they bought at…
3 Likes
Yes this especially applicable to people who bought on May 12 and 13th. Yeah the people screwed the most don’t include current buyers now because they can buy by the boatloads, but the transitory period were they were hyperinflating Luna seriously mostly late 5/12 and 5/13 when it started going from a billion to 100s of billions. They will be lumped into the 6.5 Trillion marketcap instead of their respective market caps when they purchased. This will make their stake in the Luna ~ 0. This MUST BE fixed.
4 Likes
I bought at 3.5c on 12th may 12pm utc time. Market cap was tiny and had no idea it would blowout to 6T
2 Likes
If there is ever to be a restoration of confidence in the project, then all Luna need to be treated equally whatever the relaunch plan might be. Otherwise, establishing different values to same asset dependent on when it was acquired will erode what little confidence there is in the project. It will never be possible to assign a real purchase value for each coin, so a coin purchased in Dec 2020 for $0.5 and held pre-crash can not be argued to be valued at $60 where as something purchased a few days later is worth $0.0001. Sadly, all have the same value, or more correctly lack of value. If there is demonstrated to have been fraudulent activity ahead of the crash and assets can be recovered from those responsible, then clearly any compensation would only be due to those present in the pre-crash snapshot. There needs to a way to reduce coin supply either by a massive burn or by a form of fork.
In my opinion, every unit of luna, whether u buy pre or post, should be treated the same.
There are big and small holders. There are poor investors who spent life savings and there are rich investors that can afford the losses too.
1 Like
In Do Dwon plan as it is now, pre-holders are compensated kinda fairly based on a static supply whereas post incident holders are treated based on the fully diluted 6.5 trillions supply. But people bought after the incident while the supply was clearly not as huge as it is now, that the real issue, it started going south after they stopped the network. About whales, yes I agree there should be a limitation per holder. But the most important thing is to help people based on the supply they bought at.
1 Like